 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
($$!)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'capture_06082006_161923.png' (49 KB)
Preview of image 'capture_06082006_161923.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
EagleSun wrote:
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
>
> ($$!)
>
Slartibastfart and his companies sued you?
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"EagleSun" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.4489c7549a107ae6841337530@news.povray.org...
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
>
> ($$!)
because it's so good you had the feeling you were leaving earth and you
were getting homesick?
cu!
--
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x) // ZK http://www.povplace.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"EagleSun" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
Antialiasing?
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"EagleSun" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
Now I can see it!
You are crying, because you'll never compare your render with the real
thing?
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
EagleSun wrote:
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
>
> ($$!)
>
Because it took 2 weeks to render despite the small resolution?
Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
| mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
| http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEidrcd0kWM4JG3k8RAuc/AJ9Q24si/S2taxUTLZ7qOafeHESkNgCgsrF/
P4ZZFl1JcGZzYzaXBybzjJU=
=qAV2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Please tell me you are joking.
Nice image though
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=E9r=F4me_M=2E_Berger=22?= <jeb### [at] freefr> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> EagleSun wrote:
> > Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
> >
> > ($$!)
> >
> Because it took 2 weeks to render despite the small resolution?
>
> Jerome
> - --
> +------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
> | mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
> | http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
> +---------------------------------+------------------------------+
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFEidrcd0kWM4JG3k8RAuc/AJ9Q24si/S2taxUTLZ7qOafeHESkNgCgsrF/
> P4ZZFl1JcGZzYzaXBybzjJU=
> =qAV2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BOOM! Oh how I wish all you guys's comments were true and that I was
joking... unfortunately, Jeberger guessed correctly (sortof...)
I found a parameter that can lead to a perfect render of earth, it's called
"sample". I entered some blow-out number and clicked on "Run" to render
the image. And yes, I forgot to turn on anti-alias.
Despite its small size, this render took 1 HOUR to render a simple 256^2
image!
This gets worse...
I'm working on a movie where the screen resolution will be 1280 x 720.
Assume I don't need to anti-alias (which I do), I'll render a single frame
for about 14 hours! Since the scene should be about 2 minutes long, where
the frame rate will be 24 fps, that's going to take me 40 THOUSAND HOURS!
In simple terms, this translates to 1,687.5 days, or 4 years and 7 months..
assuming optimal and continuous rendering conditions 24x7 on a 2.6 GHz
system!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> that's going to take me 40 THOUSAND HOURS!
www.imp.org :)
HTH,
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
EagleSun wrote:
> Can anyone guess why this render made me cry?
Because it took forever and you realize you want a different part of the
planet showing?
Because you forgot the stars? (Don't worry--stars are actually too
faint to see in a picture in which the earth is only this bright.)
Because it isn't your render, but you wish it were? (kidding!)
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
