 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SuperCool, and renders fast and vast. Melts in my mind.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'chocobit.png' (63 KB)
Preview of image 'chocobit.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hmmmmm...... love it!
Watch out with assumed_gamma however. The nice color comes with 2.0, but if
you set it back to 1.0, the texture becomes un-chocolatish...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlnet> wrote:
> Hmmmmm...... love it!
>
> Watch out with assumed_gamma however. The nice color comes with 2.0, but if
> you set it back to 1.0, the texture becomes un-chocolatish...
>
> Thomas
Yes, yes, very true indeed. (I've banished assumed_gamma 1.0 to the dungeon,
for the present. Anarchy! Rebellion!)
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Trevor G Quayle" <Tin### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> > I was playing around with isosurfaces, and this turned out so delicious that
> > I just *had* to share it.
> >
>
> Same function as a heightfield using function image:
> (the outcome is different as the pigment values are evaluated on the x-y
> plane rather than 3-space)
>
Even creamier than mine! Has a chocolaty fudge-like look. Where's my
spoon???
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_=27Yadgar=27_Bleimann?= <yaz### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> High!
>
> POVMAN wrote:
>
> > I know what you mean. Hmmm, actually I've never come across chocolate that
> > didn't melt in my mouth...
>
> Of course all chocolate melts in the mouth... but with the cheaper
> sorts, its structure is somewhat grainy so that you don't get in your
> mouth the smooth feeling like with real good chocolate (such as for
>
I confess, I like it ALL--from Hershey's to Godiva and beyond. Is there any
help for me???
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> schreef in bericht
news:web.442d6016d91498176e868250@news.povray.org...
> > Watch out with assumed_gamma however. The nice color comes with 2.0, but
if
> > you set it back to 1.0, the texture becomes un-chocolatish...
> >
> > Thomas
>
> Yes, yes, very true indeed. (I've banished assumed_gamma 1.0 to the
dungeon,
> for the present. Anarchy! Rebellion!)
>
Aaiii!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lonnie" <lon### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> SuperCool, and renders fast and vast. Melts in my mind.
Oh, man, I could dive right into that. Nice and milk-chocolate-y.
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> I was playing around with isosurfaces, and this turned out so delicious that
> I just *had* to share it.
I imagine with some slight altering (red color, more circular, etc) and
differencing out of some cursive text, you could make a nice old-style wax
letter seal.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"wayne461" <wde### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> > I was playing around with isosurfaces, and this turned out so delicious that
> > I just *had* to share it.
>
> I imagine with some slight altering (red color, more circular, etc) and
> differencing out of some cursive text, you could make a nice old-style wax
> letter seal.
I went and made it myself and posted it as new thread in p.b.i newsgroup
here. The thread is entitled "wax letter seal from stirred chocolate" or
something like that posted today.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kenneth wrote:
> I was playing around with isosurfaces, and this turned out so delicious that
> I just *had* to share it.
> Bon apetit!
Very nice. Thanks.
Here is the same isosurface in icecream version.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'chocolat-3.jpg' (296 KB)
Preview of image 'chocolat-3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
