 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've been beating myself about the head with media atmospheres for the past
couple of weeks (actually it's an on-going addiction and lately set off by
a case of render-envy related to the upcomming release of Terragen2). This
image was one of the results I thought I'd share.
While the turbulence on the cloud is is too regular and unrealistic, I feel
that in general the cloud and atmosphere illumination is OK and probably
worth the extended render time (29 pps, part of which was due to aa on the
trees).
Abe
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'atmos_test2.jpg' (31 KB)
Preview of image 'atmos_test2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Abe" <bul### [at] taconic net> wrote in message
news:web.439b585729d32570103c47320@news.povray.org...
> I've been beating myself about the head with media atmospheres for the
past
> couple of weeks (actually it's an on-going addiction and lately set off by
> a case of render-envy related to the upcomming release of Terragen2). This
> image was one of the results I thought I'd share.
>
> While the turbulence on the cloud is is too regular and unrealistic, I
feel
> that in general the cloud and atmosphere illumination is OK and probably
> worth the extended render time (29 pps, part of which was due to aa on the
> trees).
>
> Abe
I agree, the illumination is pretty good
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very realistic! Cloud-watching is my favorite hobby (!), and I'll bet that
if you showed this image to any ten people, they would ALL ask, "How did
you take such a nice photo?"
Ken
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Can you share the cloud code?
Thanks in advance,
Oleguer
news:web.439e9e9bcf888ccc83bb86110@news.povray.org...
> Very realistic! Cloud-watching is my favorite hobby (!), and I'll bet that
> if you showed this image to any ten people, they would ALL ask, "How did
> you take such a nice photo?"
>
> Ken
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
