POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Niagara WIP 021805 Server Time
9 Aug 2024 15:26:29 EDT (-0400)
  Niagara WIP 021805 (Message 11 to 19 of 19)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Eli
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 19 Feb 2005 06:36:43
Message: <421724cb$1@news.povray.org>
Ok. I was wondering why my back was getting so warm :-)


Post a reply to this message

From: Florian Brucker
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 19 Feb 2005 09:11:28
Message: <42174910@news.povray.org>
Aside from the fact that I don't like the way the clouds are fading to 
the horizon, I love the ship and the water. And most of all, I admire 
the patience and love for details you put into this project. You have 
put so much work into this for such a long time, I don't think I could 
ever stick to a project like this.

Really good job!


Florian
-- 
camera{look_at-y*10location<8,-3,-8>*10}#local a=0;#while(a<999)sphere{
#local _=.01*a-4.99;#local p=a*.01-5;#local c=.01*a-4.995;<sin(p*pi)*5p
*10pow(p,5)*.01>sin(c*c*c*.1)+1pigment{rgb 3}}#local a=a+1;#end
/******** http://www.torfbold.com ******** http://www.imp.org ********/


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 03:13:10
Message: <42184696@news.povray.org>
"Tim McMurdo" <jod### [at] wohrrcom> schreef in bericht
news:web.42168adde10cf7f86e93bf990@news.povray.org...
> I was running this image at lower resolution before bed last night and was
> so pleased with the results that I decided to render at a larger
> resolution. I feel as though I have reached the point that my good images
> are no longer an accident. I can now start to think about real
composition.
> Also, I need to start thinking about adding land and other objects such as
> seagulls. Of course I also need to return to finishing the ship.
>
> I plan on more modelling this weekend but will render another version of
> this image with decent AA starting Sunday evening.
>
> As always I very much value your comments and suggestions for improvement.
>
> Tim
>
Impressive. I particularly like the ship. How detailed is it? You seem to
have well-tackled the running rigging. Personally, I found that the most
difficult part to do right.

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 04:21:59
Message: <421856b7@news.povray.org>
Renderdog wrote:

>Seagulls are so common, how about some flying fish or something,
>and maybe a volcano in the distance
>
A single lonely volcano in the distance? That could be Tristan da Cunha, 
the remotest inhabited island in the world, located in the southern 
Atlantic Ocean about one third the way from Cape Town to Buenos Aires! 
Then perhaps you should also add an albatross...

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar

Now playing: On the Edge (Klaus Schulze)


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim McMurdo
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 08:50:00
Message: <web.42189524676eb5b6e93bf990@news.povray.org>
> It's getting neat!(an issue with visible containers though), I think the
> boat is too bright for the overall scene illumination.
>
> Marc

Thanks for the comments Marc. I agree the ship is too bright in this image.
I need to work on the texture of the sails to cut that down. I have
investigated the problem with the containers and it seems to be a problem
with the cloud density reaching the edge of the container. That... I know
how to fix.

Tim


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim McMurdo
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 08:55:01
Message: <web.421895a3676eb5b6e93bf990@news.povray.org>
Florian Brucker <tor### [at] torfboldcom> wrote:
> Aside from the fact that I don't like the way the clouds are fading to
> the horizon, I love the ship and the water. And most of all, I admire
> the patience and love for details you put into this project. You have
> put so much work into this for such a long time, I don't think I could
> ever stick to a project like this.
>
> Really good job!
>
>
> Florian


Florian, thanks for sharing your comments ont he fog in the distance, I too
don't like it. Sometimes I just need to hear it from somebody else to get
working on it.

Tim


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim McMurdo
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 09:00:00
Message: <web.421896bd676eb5b6e93bf990@news.povray.org>
"
> >
> Impressive. I particularly like the ship. How detailed is it? You seem to
> have well-tackled the running rigging. Personally, I found that the most
> difficult part to do right.
>
> Thomas

Thomas, I am modelling the entire ship above deck. I have almost all of the
hull and deck finished. Most of the main mast running rigging is done, but
very little of the fore mast running rigging is completed. The running
rigging is created with a macro based on the LINKS.INC file. I would be
more than happy to share the rigging include file with you if you are
interested.

I am getting a lot of questions on the level of detail of the ship. It
reminds me that I have been working on cloud and sea for a while now and
have not posted an image form the deck in quite some time. I will render
one this weekend and post it early in the week.

Thanks,

Tim


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 20 Feb 2005 12:45:15
Message: <4218ccab@news.povray.org>

news:web.42189524676eb5b6e93bf990@news.povray.org...
>
> Thanks for the comments Marc. I agree the ship is too bright in this
image.
> I need to work on the texture of the sails to cut that down.

Why not a light_group for the boat?

Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Niagara WIP 021805
Date: 21 Feb 2005 03:22:29
Message: <42199a45@news.povray.org>
"Tim McMurdo" <jod### [at] wohrrcom> schreef in bericht
news:web.421896bd676eb5b6e93bf990@news.povray.org...
> "
> Thomas, I am modelling the entire ship above deck. I have almost all of
the
> hull and deck finished. Most of the main mast running rigging is done, but
> very little of the fore mast running rigging is completed. The running
> rigging is created with a macro based on the LINKS.INC file. I would be
> more than happy to share the rigging include file with you if you are
> interested.
>
Ah! links.inc, of course! My problem came from the fact that (I modelled my
ship in Moray) I wanted also to provide some inverse kinematics to the yards
and sails, and be able to change their orientation according to the wind.
This brought me in conflict with the Bspline plugin I wanted to use for the
running rigging, as that could not be included into a csg. So I left it
momentarily. However, the ship remains a WIP, of course.
Yes please, I would be very interested in your links-based macro for the
rigging. I might find a solution for my project after all... :-)

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.