On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 10:06:27 -0400, "Aaron Gillies" <no### [at] spamcom>
wrote:


>Nice!  My setup is ... erm ... uh ... well, I'd better not say, or else I'll
>look stupid.  Let's just say that a relatively simple isosurfaces rendering
>took 5 hours and 20 minutes the other day.  Still, it's quite an improvement
>over my old 486.

Oh, the machine I have at home is quote modest - a 400 MHz K6/III. But
I get to play with these babies until Monday when the real domain
admin comes back from vacation. Then, when he is fired no later than a
week after, I'll rule, hehehe


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

Peter Popov wrote:

>What I see as a problem though is making it visually appealing

Yes! This is exactly the challenge. Making a scene which uses as many
features as possible, while still making it visually appealing and keeping
the rendering time down.

Can anyone do it? Let's see your results. :-)

Rohan _e_ii

Post a reply to this message