 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For comparison, here's an image of the old UFO with the aperture open.
--
-David
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ActionShot.jpg' (17 KB)
Preview of image 'ActionShot.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's neat. Ought to difference a hole into it where the beam hits like
it's surgically cutting into there.
--
text{ttf"arial","bob h",.1,0pigment{rgb 9}translate<-1,-.2,3>}
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> For comparison, here's an image of the old UFO with the aperture open.
sweet :)
--
Rick
Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:21:04 -0800, Dave Blandston wrote:
>For comparison, here's an image of the old UFO with the aperture open.
Real nice image. The beam looks great, almost asthough it's transporting
something down into the column for safe keeping.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeropps uklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
6:58am up 66 days, 22:43, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 1.04, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:21:04 -0800, Dave Blandston wrote:
>For comparison, here's an image of the old UFO with the aperture open.
>
PS: The shadow on the ground sucks.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
6:59am up 66 days, 22:45, 1 user, load average: 1.00, 1.03, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> PS: The shadow on the ground sucks.
What do you mean? Presumably, that's the shadow as calculated by POV and
hence accurate; maybe what you're referring to is the fact that the arm's
shadow isn't visible, which is probably because the light source is in such
a position that the UFO's shadow obscures that of its arm.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mahalis" wrote:
> > PS: The shadow on the ground sucks.
>
> What do you mean?
I think he's referring to the fact that the shadow is completely black and
completely sharp, which is not realistic. I agree that the shadows suck, but
the UFO itself is very nice and even realistic in that toony kind of way. :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Nov 5)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 09:27:20 -0500, Mahalis wrote:
>> PS: The shadow on the ground sucks.
>
>What do you mean? Presumably, that's the shadow as calculated by POV and
>hence accurate; maybe what you're referring to is the fact that the arm's
>shadow isn't visible, which is probably because the light source is in such
>a position that the UFO's shadow obscures that of its arm.
No I mean I wouldn't expect to see a shadow like that, try using
area lights in that area of the scene.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
6:50pm up 68 days, 10:36, 2 users, load average: 1.01, 1.03, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
