>the reason for leaving the proximity pattern out is that
> I am currently right in the middle of totally rewriting it.

For the better, I trust... Will it be faster?

Post a reply to this message

In article <39b1b04a@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" 
<ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote:

> For the better, I trust... Will it be faster?

Sometimes. I am changing it to allow some shapes to have their own 
proximity calculation function instead of the sampling method, but some 
shapes will still require the old kind. I am also thinking of possible 
ways to make adaptive sampling for the sampling method.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message

The second one would be good for city lights in rain...
The first one looks nebulesque... perhaps a bunch of them all over
illuminating a spaceship :-)

--
David Fontaine   <dav### [at] faricynet>   ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message

If you need help making a windows version, I got VC++ 6 ready to go.

I could give you my source changes for new bicubic patch uv mapping as well if
you're interested.

-Mike

Post a reply to this message