 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Re: test 2, [ot] my work - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 11:44:05
Message: <402a5bd5$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> MIME encode, 8bit, mime 1.0
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
BINGO!!! I saw a small POV-Ray logo.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Re: test 3, [ot] my work - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 11:44:43
Message: <402a5bfb$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> Defult encoding, 8 bitt, mime 1.0
>
> begin 644 pov.jpg
> M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0```0`!``#_VP!#``8$!08%!`8&!08'!P8("A`*"@D)
> M"A0.#PP0%Q08&!<4%A8:'24?&ALC'!86("P@(R8G*2HI&1\M,"TH,"4H*2C_
> MVP!#`0<'!PH("A,*"A,H&A8:*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H
Didn't work. Looks like the above. No pic shown.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> (litle screenshot in attachment, I can't show entire manual / shaders due
> to licence restrictions. Image is readable to all news clients I hope?)
This _was_ viewable with Outlook Express.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Severi Salminen
Subject: Re: test 3, [ot] my work - 1 attachment - 1 attachment
Date: 11 Feb 2004 11:53:21
Message: <402a5e01$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> Defult encoding, 8 bitt, mime 1.0
This also was viewable with OE.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 18:36:07 +0200, Severi Salminen
<sev### [at] NOT_THISsiba fi> wrote:
> > (litle screenshot in attachment, I can't show entire manual / shaders due
> > to licence restrictions. Image is readable to all news clients I hope?)
>
> Yes, the image was _readable_, not viewable.
>
> You really have to configure your news client to make proper
> attachments. Or then I'll dump this Thunderbird I'm using...
That image was fine for my Forte Agent and for news.povray.org
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/34631/
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11 Feb 2004 11:39:16 -0500, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256com> wrote:
> Sorry, please tell me witch of following attachments (in following posts
> below this one) is viewable to You (1,2,... ?)
Rafal, this is not test group.
Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ABX wrote:
>>Yes, the image was _readable_, not viewable.
>>
>>You really have to configure your news client to make proper
>>attachments. Or then I'll dump this Thunderbird I'm using...
>
>
> That image was fine for my Forte Agent and for news.povray.org
> http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/34631/
Then I take my words back and Thunderbird (v0.5) is to be blamed. I hope
they'll fix the problem.
Severi
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
abx### [at] abxartpl news:pmnk20l80po64rqfr21kkc2oimdkath86q@4ax.com
> Rafal, this is not test group.
> Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.
I used a realy small (10 lines) attachment, but ok - sorry.
(btw how about creating povray.test or povray.news-client.test group with
expiration time of 3 days? if it isnt much work ofcourse, just an idea)
--
#macro g(U,V)(.4*abs(sin(9*sqrt(pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))))*pow(1-min(1,(sqrt(
pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))*.3)),2)+.9)#end#macro p(c)#if(c>1)#local l=mod(c,100
);g(2*div(l,10)-8,2*mod(l,10)-8)*p(div(c,100))#else 1#end#end light_source{
y 2}sphere{z*20 9pigment{function{p(26252423)*p(36455644)*p(66656463)}}}//M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Someone searching for the proper way to post attachments in these newsgroups
may come across this brief discussion. If it was posted in off-topic,
people may be more repeat the same mistakes of the past.
He kept the attachments very small. Personally, I don't see the problem,
any more than someone posting "Thanks" to someone else's "Nice Image!".
Just my 2 cents.
--
Jeremy
www.beantoad.com
"ABX" <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote in message
news:pmnk20l80po64rqfr21kkc2oimdkath86q@4ax.com...
> On 11 Feb 2004 11:39:16 -0500, "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <spa### [at] raf256com>
wrote:
> > Sorry, please tell me witch of following attachments (in following posts
> > below this one) is viewable to You (1,2,... ?)
>
> Rafal, this is not test group.
> Only posts in povray.off-topic expire.
>
> ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:18:17 -0500, "Jeremy M. Praay"
<jer### [at] questsoftwarecom> wrote:
> Someone searching for the proper way to post attachments in these newsgroups
> may come across this brief discussion. If it was posted in off-topic,
> people may be more repeat the same mistakes of the past.
>
> He kept the attachments very small. Personally, I don't see the problem,
> any more than someone posting "Thanks" to someone else's "Nice Image!".
I completly agree with you about the way Rafal did it. The reason behind my
note was that readers learn bad habits by seeing wrong examples. If wrong
example has no note that it was indeed wrong than by repeating it becames
(still wrong) rule. Not every newbie realizes difference in bandwith between
small image and large image, between one post and four posts. Now, with four
answers, we used probably more space than Rafal did, but if it could stop some
person in the future to use that server/group for testing attachemnts with
100kB image then it was success :-)
ABX
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
