Now it worked! Shows even up inline in my newsreader.


Rafal 'Raf256' Maj wrote:
> JPEG is poor for "computer-generated" images (with clear, light color),
> eaven at 95 quality still artefacts are very visible. Asecialy in non-
> blured sphere - the border around red checker is blured and have dark-red
> sourounding

I cannot see any artifacts without zooming in. If you really need an 
alternative to jpeg I would suggest png which is wider spread in the web 
than tiff.

- Micha

Post a reply to this message

This worked.  

The blur method used seems to be similar to the one i used in Megapov
MCP.  It's probably also at least as slow as there... ;-)

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, IsoWood include,                 
TransSkin and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/  
Last updated 15 Jul. 2002 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message

Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde> wrote in 
news:3D397D07.D39A484C@gmx.de

> This worked.  

yupe ;)

> The blur method used seems to be similar to the one i used in Megapov
> MCP.  It's probably also at least as slow as there... ;-)

probalby slower, but it works on pure Pov 3.5


-- 

> A jedyne co czytam, ze to terrorysci internetowi z echelonu planuja
> kolejny atak na centrale TPSA
- Expert vel Jacek (obecnie gol### [at] pocztaonetpl)

Post a reply to this message