 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Is this output directly from Pov-Ray? If so, how did you accomplish this?
-Shay
"ingo" <ing### [at] home nl> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] povrayorg...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:3ccbe17b$4@news.povray.org Hugo wrote:
> You know, only those people who coinsidently sits in a totally dark
> room, will be able to see it?
Not in totally dark, but yes, a monitor contrast range is already small
and in a bright room nothing is left.
But should that limit you in your art-work?
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:3ccc3f85$1@news.povray.org Shay wrote:
> Is this output directly from Pov-Ray? If so, how did you accomplish
> this?
>
>
Yes, it uses radiosity, photons and extreme focal blurr settings:
very large aperture, blur_samples 5, variance 1
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> But should that limit you in your art-work?
No, you're right.. The monitors and the enviroment in which we put them are
the problem.. So I guess the question is, wether an artist focus on his
product, or the audience who is going to "experience" it.. I guess,
personally I try to share my attention 50% each, though it is not a rule
without exception.
Btw, now it's dark here and I can see your image. :o) It's a nice and
special flower.. The shape is subtle (perhaps too grainy but..) ... but it's
artwork..
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
