Cool images, btw!

- Kevin R.

"Sven Heinzel" <tra### [at] sirius666de> wrote in message
news:Xns### [at] sirius666de...
> Hello,
>
> Just some small 'experiments':
> The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> a testing with negative ior.
>
> On my raytracing homepage are high resolution versions of these images
> and some more.
>
> Sven
>
> --
> Homepages
> Raytracing: http://www.sternenwanderer.com/
> Gaming: http://www.sirius666.de/
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

> Yes, but the likelihood of your ever coming across such a material is
extremely low.

almost a negative .....


--
Rick

Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA

Post a reply to this message

Rick [Kitty5] <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3c9afad9@news.povray.org...
> > Yes, but the likelihood of your ever coming across such a material is
> extremely low.
>
> almost a negative .....
>

laugh.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message

If you were looking out of a dense material into another less dense material
(for instance, out of water into air) then it would appear to have a
negative ior.  Also, if you had a vaccuum it would look like a negative ior
from our atmophere.

Stephen

"Kevin R." <$vjr#spam#iggle@mtcn$spam$et.net#> wrote in message
news:3c9a668e@news.povray.org...
> > The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> > a testing with negative ior.
> Is negative ior possible in real life?
>
> - Kevin R.
>
> "Sven Heinzel" <tra### [at] sirius666de> wrote in message
> news:Xns### [at] sirius666de...
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just some small 'experiments':
> > The first one simulates fur with a lot of cones and the second image is
> > a testing with negative ior.
> >
> > On my raytracing homepage are high resolution versions of these images
> > and some more.
> >
> > Sven
> >
> > --
> > Homepages
> > Raytracing: http://www.sternenwanderer.com/
> > Gaming: http://www.sirius666.de/
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ----
>
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

3ca016f5$1@news.povray.org...
> If you were looking out of a dense material into another less dense
material
> (for instance, out of water into air) then it would appear to have a
> negative ior.  Also, if you had a vaccuum it would look like a negative
ior
> from our atmophere.
>
> Stephen
>
Isn't it a ior < 1 ?
Marc

Post a reply to this message

Marc Jacquier wrote:
> 
> Isn't it a ior < 1 ?

Doesn't "negative" imply "<1" ? ;-)
But surely you are right.

Markus

Post a reply to this message

Hey you know that I meant 0<IOR<1 don't you? :-)


3CA07E70.EBE83E6B@aicoss.de...
> Marc Jacquier wrote:
> >
> > Isn't it a ior < 1 ?
>
> Doesn't "negative" imply "<1" ? ;-)
> But surely you are right.
>
> Markus

Post a reply to this message