 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The way the lights interact with the branches is impressively realistic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi,
looks very realistic to me.
Good work,
Stefan
--
http://home.t-online.de/home/StefanWz/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
RGB ornaments, hehe (or you were being lazy)
Cool. Object total/render time? Looks like a lot of cylinders or cones or
something.
Where's the flock? :)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That looks great, the shadows on the floor are well worth
the 7-8 hours.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
1:48pm up 2 days, 1:09, 2 users, load average: 1.07, 1.02, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in povray.binaries.images, Lutz-Peter Hooge says...
>
> hello,
>
> There are amazingly few chrismas images here, I think.
> lets do somethong against that :-)
>
> Render time about 7:40 on Athlon 500, 256 MB RAM.
Ooh, beautiful! May I use it to send by E-mail to some members of my
family? I can never make something like it and my e-mails are so cold and
dark.. ;(
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hello,
> RGB ornaments, hehe (or you were being lazy)
Ornaments? You mean that I only used plain colors?
Thats because im not good in creating complex textures.
> Looks like a lot of cylinders or cones or
> something.
49663 objects. Parsed in only 20 seconds and took 150MB RAM.
The lightbuffers needed another 150MB.
God thanks I upgraded to 256 last weekend!
> Where's the flock? :)
flock? Sorry, I don't know that word (I'm not a native english speaker,
sorry)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
hello,
> Ooh, beautiful! May I use it to send by E-mail to some members of my
> family?
Feel free to do so.
(but remember many people, including me, don't like binaries in their
e-mail)
> I can never make something like it
Don't say such things. It's not THAT difficult.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in povray.binaries.images, Lutz-Peter Hooge says...
> hello,
> Don't say such things. It's not THAT difficult.
>
It's not so much the technical difficulty as well as the idea that is
behind such images that I was referring to. But: thanks.
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:25:16 +0100, Lutz-Peter Hooge wrote:
>> Where's the flock? :)
>flock? Sorry, I don't know that word (I'm not a native english speaker,
>sorry)
Flock is the collective noun for sheep, one of the popular christmas
carrols starts "While shephards watch their flocks by night".
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:ste### [at] zeroppsuklinuxnet
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:48pm up 2 days, 10:08, 2 users, load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lutz-Peter Hooge wrote:
> > Where's the flock? :)
> flock? Sorry, I don't know that word (I'm not a native english speaker,
> sorry)
Fake spray-on snow.
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
My raytracing gallery: http://davidf.faricy.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
