POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images: Stacker Again

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Stacker Again		Server Time 3 Oct 2024 19:20:23 EDT (-0400)

From: ryan mooney
Subject: Stacker Again
Date: 2 Jan 2000 00:59:37
Message: <386D99AA.A836569C@earthlink.net>

Here is the stacks w/ a few scaled and translated in the center
structure to give it the illusion of  mass to some some kind...
Any artistic suggestions...?
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'stack11.jpg' (79 KB)

Preview of image 'stack11.jpg'

From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: Stacker Again
Date: 2 Jan 2000 04:03:40
Message: <386f146c@news.povray.org>

I think it still looks too thin if you are trying to make it
look like a mountain.
Possibly because of the regularity of the openings.
However if it was a space ship it would be just
about ready to take off!

Peter

Post a reply to this message

From: omniVERSE
Subject: Re: Stacker Again
Date: 2 Jan 2000 10:12:03
Message: <386f6ac3@news.povray.org>

The scale isn't establishable I think.  If it only had some low clouds or
ground fog it might help to tell what size it is, or any other thing that
compares against it.

Bob

"ryan mooney" <rdm### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:386D99AA.A836569C@earthlink.net...
> Here is the stacks w/ a few scaled and translated in the center
> structure to give it the illusion of  mass to some some kind...
> Any artistic suggestions...?
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

From: ryan mooney
Subject: Re: Stacker Again
Date: 3 Jan 2000 05:12:47
Message: <386F26B2.BF605315@earthlink.net>

Any ideas on how to make it more structured and more solid around the
openings.
besides changing the entire structure i'm stuck on this one...???

Peter Warren wrote:

> I think it still looks too thin if you are trying to make it
> look like a mountain.
> Possibly because of the regularity of the openings.
> However if it was a space ship it would be just
> about ready to take off!
>
> Peter

Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Stacker Again
Date: 3 Jan 2000 10:12:27
Message: <3870bc5b@news.povray.org>

I just can't read this subject title without thinking about the Disk
Compression utility that was popular when a large HD was 40 Megs.

Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: Stacker Again
Date: 4 Jan 2000 01:10:03
Message: <9IxxOAXWDynAZEnJqqJ6Ttjn9VC2@4ax.com>

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000 10:12:24 -0500, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>
>I just can't read this subject title without thinking about the Disk
>Compression utility that was popular when a large HD was 40 Megs.

Oh glorious days of the past! Running Windows on a 286/12/640kb/20MB
over Stacker 3.1 and playing with PhotoStyler 2.0... it took a good
two hours to motion blur a 320x200 grayscale image. <sigh> Such fond
memories...

Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700

Post a reply to this message