 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:47:01 +0100, "LightBeam" <s.f### [at] tiscali fr>
wrote:
>Great atmosphere... SF redish like !
>
Thanks a lot!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 00:14:33 +0100, Dave Vogt <pov### [at] frozenbraincom>
wrote:
>I like them more with inverted colors. And so, it made my new desktop.
>(well, I'm an inverted-colors-maniac; I like most pictures more when
>inverted, dunno why ;) )
>
>
>Dave
>
>Ah, btw: looks great!
Thanks a lot! If you want a bigger one or whatever just tell me and I
will shoot you the (simple) source.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Oldstench" <sry### [at] nocom> wrote in message
news:966c50phvp4ljipoc70t34jv9r5ijat6rd@4ax.com...
> Got bored and decided to make a new desktop bg. Nothing spectacular,
> but I do really like the colors.
Sweet!
--
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm wondering how you got such smooth focal blur results. Really high
blur samples? (like above 50?)
Oldstench wrote:
> Got bored and decided to make a new desktop bg. Nothing spectacular,
> but I do really like the colors.
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Dave Vogt
Subject: Re: New desktop image (~79k) - bg_blur.jpg
Date: 16 Mar 2004 16:19:31
Message: <40576f63@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oldstench wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks a lot! If you want a bigger one or whatever just tell me and I
> will shoot you the (simple) source.
Yes, please...
Greets
--
Dave "tPassive" Vogt| ruby -e "n=gets.to_i;a=(2..n).to_a;a.each{
Linux user #225040| |x|puts x;(x*2).step(n,x){|j|a.delete j}}"
____________________|_____________________________ |
PGP Key: http://control-alt-del.ch/public_key.asc \____________/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:11:42 -0800, "Samuel T. Benge"
<stb### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>I'm wondering how you got such smooth focal blur results. Really high
>blur samples? (like above 50?)
>
Here are the blur settings:
aperture 0.5
blur_samples 600
variance 1/100000
confidence .95
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:15:03 -0600, "Dan P"
<dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>"Oldstench" <sry### [at] nocom> wrote in message
>news:966c50phvp4ljipoc70t34jv9r5ijat6rd@4ax.com...
>> Got bored and decided to make a new desktop bg. Nothing spectacular,
>> but I do really like the colors.
>
>Sweet!
TY!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oldstench wrote:
>>I'm wondering how you got such smooth focal blur results. Really high
>>blur samples? (like above 50?)
>>
>
> Here are the blur settings:
>
> aperture 0.5
> blur_samples 600
> variance 1/100000
> confidence .95
One tip: use "variance 0" for the best results. For some reason there
seems to be little difference between 1/100000 and (say) 1/500000 but
using 0 gives superior results in many situations. Confidence has much
smaller impact.
Severi S.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:19:31 +0100, Dave Vogt <pov### [at] frozenbraincom>
wrote:
>Oldstench wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> Thanks a lot! If you want a bigger one or whatever just tell me and I
>> will shoot you the (simple) source.
>
>Yes, please...
>
>Greets
Scene is posted in p.t.scene-files
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>One tip: use "variance 0" for the best results. For some reason there
>seems to be little difference between 1/100000 and (say) 1/500000 but
>using 0 gives superior results in many situations. Confidence has much
>smaller impact.
>
>Severi S.
Thanks for the heads up!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
