 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A bit of improvements.
The bronze texture used is given here (for POV versions 3.7 or better 3.8):
//-------------------------------------------------
//from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_(color)
#declare P_bronze1 = rgb <205/255, 127/255, 50/255>; //is: HTML/CSS
#CD7F32 code. see also: https://htmlcolorcodes.com/colors/bronze/
#declare P_bronze2 = rgb <150/255, 116/255, 68/255>; //is: Hex Color:
#967444. see: https://colorcodes.io/brown/bronze-color-codes/
//with variations:
#declare P_bronze3 = rgb <87/255, 67/255, 39/255>; //#574327
#declare P_bronze4 = rgb <227/255, 175/255, 102/255>; //#E3AF66
#declare P_bronze5 = rgb <163/255, 126/255, 73/255>; //#A37E49
#declare P_bronze6 = rgb <125/255, 96/255, 56/255>; //#7D6038
#declare P_BlastOff_bronze = rgb <165/255, 113/255, 100/255>; //Crayola
#declare P_Antique_bronze = srgb <102/255, 93/255, 30/255>;
//My bronze:
#declare P_My_bronze = rgb <242/255, 221/255, 137/255>;
// Based on texture CastMetal by Tim Attwood
#declare CastBronze =
texture {
pigment {P_bronze4}
normal {granite bump_size 0.01 scale 0.01}
finish {
diffuse 0.01
brilliance 1
metallic on
specular 0.6
roughness 0.01
reflection {0.001, 0.6 metallic on }
conserve_energy
}
}
//-------------------------------------------------
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'objects_test - bronzeagesword_03.png' (538 KB)
Preview of image 'objects_test - bronzeagesword_03.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13/07/2023 17:12, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> A bit of improvements.
>
> The bronze texture used is given here (for POV versions 3.7 or better 3.8):
> snip
>
A small remark for lazy people like me, it's shorter to write
<a,b,c>/255 rather than <a/255, b/255, c/255>...
That said, the geometry is excellent
--
Kurtz le pirate
Compagnie de la Banquise
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 14-7-2023 om 09:23 schreef kurtz le pirate:
> On 13/07/2023 17:12, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> A bit of improvements.
>>
>> The bronze texture used is given here (for POV versions 3.7 or better 3.8):
>> snip
>>
>
> A small remark for lazy people like me, it's shorter to write
> <a,b,c>/255 rather than <a/255, b/255, c/255>...
>
I know. ;-)
However, I seem to remember that Clipka once told us that - especially
when srgb is involved (not here directly, though) - it would be wiser to
write it like I did here. So, being an obedient pupil, I followed
(blindly) his advise. :-)
That said, I happen very often to be lazy too...
> That said, the geometry is excellent
>
Thank you sir! Trying to continue in the same vein.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2023-07-14 07:34 (-4), Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Op 14-7-2023 om 09:23 schreef kurtz le pirate:
>>
>> A small remark for lazy people like me, it's shorter to write
>> <a,b,c>/255 rather than <a/255, b/255, c/255>...
>>
> I know. ;-)
> However, I seem to remember that Clipka once told us that - especially
> when srgb is involved (not here directly, though) - it would be wiser to
> write it like I did here. So, being an obedient pupil, I followed
> (blindly) his advise. :-)
You remember incorrectly (again).
https://news.povray.org/6065d1ea%241%40news.povray.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 14-7-2023 om 15:04 schreef Cousin Ricky:
> You remember incorrectly (again).
>
> https://news.povray.org/6065d1ea%241%40news.povray.org
>
WHY am I not surprised?!? :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 14-7-2023 om 16:12 schreef Thomas de Groot:
> WHY am I not surprised?!? :-)
>
It all relates to the following discussion:
http://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3Cweb.60649d9bb9b7dccdd98418916e066e29%40news.povray.org%3E/?mtop=433443
Where I probably lost track, not really understanding the matter. Only
flotsam survived on the waves of my memory...
[to self: I need to re-read this...]
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> On 2023-07-14 07:34 (-4), Thomas de Groot wrote:
> > Op 14-7-2023 om 09:23 schreef kurtz le pirate:
> >>
> >> A small remark for lazy people like me, it's shorter to write
> >> <a,b,c>/255 rather than <a/255, b/255, c/255>...
> >>
> > I know. ;-)
> > However, I seem to remember that Clipka once told us that - especially
> > when srgb is involved (not here directly, though) - it would be wiser to
> > write it like I did here. So, being an obedient pupil, I followed
> > (blindly) his advise. :-)
>
> You remember incorrectly (again).
>
> https://news.povray.org/6065d1ea%241%40news.povray.org
Ooooooh. Thomas made a naughty. :O
I'd say that since we're 30+ years in, maybe we ought to have a macro of some
sort with plenty of explanatory documentation IN the macro code.
#macro SRGB (byteTriplet, optional Multiplier)
// Converts a byte value <0-255, 0-255, 0-255> to a
// POV-Ray compliant rgb color vector <0-1, 0-1, 0-1>
// Usage: SRGB (<r, g, b>)
// - or -
// SRGB (<r, g, b>) * Multiplier
// From: Cousin Ricky
// Subject: Re: strange problem with srgb color in light_source
// https://news.povray.org/606cb0f5%40news.povray.org
// Here is the general sequence:
/*
1. An sRGB triplet that comes from a color picker, eyedropper tool, or
published Web source is typically in the range <0,0,0> ...
<255,255,255>. Divide this by 255 to bring it into the range
<0,0,0> ... <1,1,1>. This /must/ be done first thing, and is the
only math that should ever be done at this stage, though it may be
combined with step 2.
*/
#local srgbColorVector = byteTriplet/255;
/*
2. #declare the color with the srgb keyword. The resulting identifier
contains a linear color.
*/
#local RGBcolor = srgb srgbColorVector;
/*
3. Now, do whatever additional math you need on the identifier. You may
do this in a pigment or light_source or wherever.
*/
// ^^^ leave this for outside of the macro
RGBcolor
#end
This, as just a simple prototype.
Something better that takes all the information (filter, transmit, multipliers)
would be nice, and would have sanity checks for out of range values, negative
values, etc.
Maybe I need to go back to the scenes where I was working out the srgb math and
use that to make a documentation infographic, and possibly an animation.
It would be way better to have a nice, fully presented thing in the distribution
that lays out all of the whys and hows, than to have to rehash this topic ever
few years.
Than people can visually and mathematically see what the byte triplet values
are, the in-range nonlinear srgb values are, the in-range linear rgb values, and
how they all relate to one another. Just do a simple animation from <0, 0, 0>
to <255, 255, 255>, and I think that might very well cover it.
Some examples that simultaneously show the incorrect way to convert from srgb to
rgb would likely be helpful as well.
- BW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Not yet entirely satisfying but this is a first acceptable model of a
> (leaf-shaped) cast-bronze /blade/. Texture based on an example by Tim
> Attwood.
>
> I modelled one quarter of the blade which is then mirrored 3x.
>
> The sword's grip will be modelled over the blade, more or less how this
> was done at the time.
>
> --
> Thomas
Nice Job! love the model and material.
Miller
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 14/07/2023 om 19:42 schreef Bald Eagle:
> Ooooooh. Thomas made a naughty. :O
>
Yeaahh.... What did you expect? ;-)
> I'd say that since we're 30+ years in, maybe we ought to have a macro of some
> sort with plenty of explanatory documentation IN the macro code.
>
That would be a very good idea indeed. I have been wandering around for
some time with the same and slowly started to add comprehensive (?)
comments to those macros or includes I use most often as I generally
forget what or why to do in particular cases from one project to the
other. Re-inventing the wheel each time as it were...
Your example looks very neat. I shall study it some more and take
inspiration from it.
> [snip]
>
> This, as just a simple prototype.
> Something better that takes all the information (filter, transmit, multipliers)
> would be nice, and would have sanity checks for out of range values, negative
> values, etc.
>
> Maybe I need to go back to the scenes where I was working out the srgb math and
> use that to make a documentation infographic, and possibly an animation.
>
> It would be way better to have a nice, fully presented thing in the distribution
> that lays out all of the whys and hows, than to have to rehash this topic ever
> few years.
>
Not that I mind to re-ignite the discussion every few years as I seem to
do ;-) but I fully agree with you on this.
> Than people can visually and mathematically see what the byte triplet values
> are, the in-range nonlinear srgb values are, the in-range linear rgb values, and
> how they all relate to one another. Just do a simple animation from <0, 0, 0>
> to <255, 255, 255>, and I think that might very well cover it.
> Some examples that simultaneously show the incorrect way to convert from srgb to
> rgb would likely be helpful as well.
>
> - BW
>
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Op 15-7-2023 om 06:01 schreef Mike Miller:
> Nice Job! love the model and material.
> Miller
>
Thanks Mike. This kind of project is a good opportunity to plunge into
the archaeological background of the subject and revisit my bookshelves
on the period (got some dusting to do too) completed with an internet
search of course.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
