 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
face on it.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'drap-04b-2m49s.jpg' (323 KB)
Preview of image 'drap-04b-2m49s.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>
> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
>
> --
> jaime
I love it - do you remember memory need?
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 08/03/16 a las 11:45, Norbert Kern escribió:
> I love it - do you remember memory need?
No, but I just rendered it again, and I can't see it reported
anywhere on the output:
==== [Parsing...] ==========================================================
Parsing 98471K tokens
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parser Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finite Objects: 260003
Infinite Objects: 1
Light Sources: 1
Total: 260005
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parser Time
Parse Time: 0 hours 1 minutes 3 seconds (63.464 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 48.768 CPU-seconds total
Bounding Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.913 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 0.911 CPU-seconds total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Render Options
Quality: 9
Bounding boxes.......On Bounding threshold: 3
Antialiasing.........On (Method 1, Threshold 0.300, Depth 3, Jitter
1.00,
Gamma 2.50)
==== [Rendering...] ========================================================
Rendered 786432 of 786432 pixels (100%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Render Statistics
Image Resolution 1024 x 768
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pixels: 836189 Samples: 6236739 Smpls/Pxl: 7.46
Rays: 8784686 Saved: 0 Max Level: 4/5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ray->Shape Intersection Tests Succeeded Percentage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Box 12303161 12303161 100.00
Mesh 359030468 34685638 9.66
Plane 12303161 7880984 64.06
Sphere 12303161 12303161 100.00
Bounding Box 3818952101 1488571642 38.98
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shadow Ray Tests: 5559559 Succeeded: 3350070
Shadow Cache Hits: 2041084
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiosity samples calculated: 51432 (0.59 %)
discarded due to low quality: 4356
retained for re-use: 47076
Radiosity samples reused: 8649801
Radiosity sample rays shot: 1711758
Radiosity octree nodes: 1181
Radiosity octree samples/node: 39.86
Radiosity blocks examined: 10482324788
Radiosity blocks passed test 0: 10482324788 (100.00 %)
Radiosity blocks passed test 1: 1227842362 (11.71 %)
Radiosity blocks passed test 2: 913390395 (8.71 %)
Radiosity blocks passed test 3: 184540151 (1.76 %)
Radiosity blocks passed test 4: 63080136 (0.60 %)
Radiosity blocks passed test 5: 59940830 (0.57 %)
Radiosity blocks rejected: 10422383958 (99.43 %)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiosity Depth 0 calculated: 46523 (0.66 %)
Radiosity Depth 0 reused: 7026405
Radiosity Depth 0 rays shot: 1628305
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Radiosity (final) calculated: 46109 (0.53 %)
Radiosity (final) reused: 8633344
Radiosity (final) rays shot: 1610377
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pass Depth 0 Depth 1 Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 130 1220 1350
2 475 3498 3973
Final 45918 191 46109
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 46523 4909 51432
Weight 0.451 0.269
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Render Time:
Photon Time: No photons
Radiosity Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.723 seconds)
using 6 thread(s) with 3.843 CPU-seconds total
Trace Time: 0 hours 1 minutes 27 seconds (87.606 seconds)
using 6 thread(s) with 517.339 CPU-seconds total
==== [Paused] ==============================================================
Press a key or click the display to continue...
POV-Ray finished
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/8/2016 5:24 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>
> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
>
> --
> jaime
>
I would gladly dry myself off with that.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/8/2016 10:24 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
That does look good.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-3-2016 11:24, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>
> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
>
> --
> jaime
>
Reminds me of this render from 2014. I don't know how many threads were
used in this one; quite a lot for the whole carpet and it was pretty
fast too iirc.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eval_pigmenttest_03.png' (1078 KB)
Preview of image 'eval_pigmenttest_03.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 08/03/16 a las 13:29, Thomas de Groot escribió:
> Reminds me of this render from 2014. I don't know how many threads
> were used in this one; quite a lot for the whole carpet and it was
> pretty fast too iirc.
Ah, yes... I didn't remember that one, but do remember now. Looks
gorgeous too. But here the threads seem all vertical? On my towel I used
a pigment (bumps) as a guide to tilt the threads smoothly.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 16-03-08 05:24, Jaime Vives Piqueres a écrit :
> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>
> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
>
> --
> jaime
>
Are you sure that's not the reference photo that you used as an inspiration?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 08/03/16 a las 19:42, Alain escribió:
> Are you sure that's not the reference photo that you used as an
> inspiration?
I didn't use a reference photo this time... sorry! :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-3-2016 18:23, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Ah, yes... I didn't remember that one, but do remember now. Looks
> gorgeous too. But here the threads seem all vertical? On my towel I used
> a pigment (bumps) as a guide to tilt the threads smoothly.
>
I used a slight perturbation on the threads' angles. Nothing fancy I
confess. It was a kind of proof of concept for me and I might dig into
the code some day when I shall need a carpet badly (that is how things
work for me most of the time).
I checked the code and saw it dropped 500k threads on the whole carpet.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Both the towel and the carpet are very nice !
Well done :-)
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 8-3-2016 18:23, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> > Ah, yes... I didn't remember that one, but do remember now. Looks
> > gorgeous too. But here the threads seem all vertical? On my towel I used
> > a pigment (bumps) as a guide to tilt the threads smoothly.
> >
>
> I used a slight perturbation on the threads' angles. Nothing fancy I
> confess. It was a kind of proof of concept for me and I might dig into
> the code some day when I shall need a carpet badly (that is how things
> work for me most of the time).
>
> I checked the code and saw it dropped 500k threads on the whole carpet.
>
>
> --
> Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These are GREAT looking renders :)
I went back and looked at the carpet I did for TINA-CheP, and it looks more like
a dog ate crayons and then vomited them in a rectangle on the floor.
:(
That may be a project I revisit at another time.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/10/2016 9:10 PM, Bald Eagle wrote:
> These are GREAT looking renders :)
>
> I went back and looked at the carpet I did for TINA-CheP, and it looks more like
> a dog ate crayons and then vomited them in a rectangle on the floor.
> :(
>
Invokes an image. :)
But you do yourself down. Your carpet was furnishing. At that level of
detail it would have distracted from the overall image.
> That may be a project I revisit at another time.
>
And there is no time like... ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 10/03/16 a las 22:10, Bald Eagle escribió:
> These are GREAT looking renders :)
Thanks!
> I went back and looked at the carpet I did for TINA-CheP, and it
> looks more like a dog ate crayons and then vomited them in a
> rectangle on the floor. :(
As Stephen said, it was a very ambitious project and the carpet was
just a little part of it, and not entirely visible.
> That may be a project I revisit at another time.
Revisiting old scenes is a great way to keep tracing when inspiration
for new ones is missing... I do it from time to time, tough most times
they end being very different.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-3-2016 23:40, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Revisiting old scenes is a great way to keep tracing when inspiration
> for new ones is missing... I do it from time to time, tough most times
> they end being very different.
>
<grin> yes indeed.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08.03.2016 05:24, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>
> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>
> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
> face on it.
>
> --
> jaime
>
To me, it lools almost real. Add a little bit more light to hit, so the
white is brighter. Or some Ariel washing solution. The light should come
slightly from a side beside the middle. Just my imagination.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08.03.2016 06:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> El 08/03/16 a las 11:45, Norbert Kern escribió:
>> I love it - do you remember memory need?
>
> No, but I just rendered it again, and I can't see it reported anywhere
> on the output:
>
>
> ==== [Parsing...]
> ==========================================================
> Parsing 98471K tokens
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Parser Statistics
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Finite Objects: 260003
> Infinite Objects: 1
> Light Sources: 1
> Total: 260005
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Parser Time
> Parse Time: 0 hours 1 minutes 3 seconds (63.464 seconds)
> using 1 thread(s) with 48.768 CPU-seconds total
> Bounding Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.913 seconds)
> using 1 thread(s) with 0.911 CPU-seconds total
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Render Options
> Quality: 9
> Bounding boxes.......On Bounding threshold: 3
> Antialiasing.........On (Method 1, Threshold 0.300, Depth 3, Jitter
> 1.00,
> Gamma 2.50)
> ==== [Rendering...]
> ========================================================
> Rendered 786432 of 786432 pixels (100%)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Render Statistics
> Image Resolution 1024 x 768
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Pixels: 836189 Samples: 6236739 Smpls/Pxl: 7.46
> Rays: 8784686 Saved: 0 Max Level: 4/5
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Ray->Shape Intersection Tests Succeeded Percentage
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Box 12303161 12303161 100.00
> Mesh 359030468 34685638 9.66
> Plane 12303161 7880984 64.06
> Sphere 12303161 12303161 100.00
> Bounding Box 3818952101 1488571642 38.98
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Shadow Ray Tests: 5559559 Succeeded: 3350070
> Shadow Cache Hits: 2041084
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Radiosity samples calculated: 51432 (0.59 %)
> discarded due to low quality: 4356
> retained for re-use: 47076
> Radiosity samples reused: 8649801
> Radiosity sample rays shot: 1711758
> Radiosity octree nodes: 1181
> Radiosity octree samples/node: 39.86
> Radiosity blocks examined: 10482324788
> Radiosity blocks passed test 0: 10482324788 (100.00 %)
> Radiosity blocks passed test 1: 1227842362 (11.71 %)
> Radiosity blocks passed test 2: 913390395 (8.71 %)
> Radiosity blocks passed test 3: 184540151 (1.76 %)
> Radiosity blocks passed test 4: 63080136 (0.60 %)
> Radiosity blocks passed test 5: 59940830 (0.57 %)
> Radiosity blocks rejected: 10422383958 (99.43 %)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Radiosity Depth 0 calculated: 46523 (0.66 %)
> Radiosity Depth 0 reused: 7026405
> Radiosity Depth 0 rays shot: 1628305
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Radiosity (final) calculated: 46109 (0.53 %)
> Radiosity (final) reused: 8633344
> Radiosity (final) rays shot: 1610377
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Pass Depth 0 Depth 1 Total
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 1 130 1220 1350
> 2 475 3498 3973
> Final 45918 191 46109
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Total 46523 4909 51432
> Weight 0.451 0.269
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Render Time:
> Photon Time: No photons
> Radiosity Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.723 seconds)
> using 6 thread(s) with 3.843 CPU-seconds total
> Trace Time: 0 hours 1 minutes 27 seconds (87.606 seconds)
> using 6 thread(s) with 517.339 CPU-seconds total
> ==== [Paused]
> ==============================================================
> Press a key or click the display to continue...
>
> POV-Ray finished
>
>
> --
> jaime
The memory consumption is displayed during the render, at the bottom,
somewhere at the right side. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08.03.2016 07:29, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 8-3-2016 11:24, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> This is an old mesh generated with Megapov back in 2006, but now
>> resurrected to try some "furrifying" experiments. It uses some 260000
>> mesh threads traced randomly onto the mesh. No hg-povray yet... just a
>> test with regular pov for later comparison. Renders really fast using
>> default radiosity (1m46s), and parse time is not that bad (1m3s).
>>
>> The lovely image map used as base is from archivetextures.net.
>>
>> I like the look of it... like a softener ad: makes you want to rub your
>> face on it.
>>
>> --
>> jaime
>>
>
Beautiful.
> Reminds me of this render from 2014. I don't know how many threads were
> used in this one; quite a lot for the whole carpet and it was pretty
> fast too iirc.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 13/03/2016 06:42, Sven Littkowski a écrit :
>
>
> On 08.03.2016 06:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> El 08/03/16 a las 11:45, Norbert Kern escribió:
>>> I love it - do you remember memory need?
>>
>> No, but I just rendered it again, and I can't see it reported anywhere
>> on the output:
>>
>
>
> The memory consumption is displayed during the render, at the bottom,
> somewhere at the right side. :-)
>
I'm afraid it is visible only on Windows.
for other systems, it might be useful to use a bit of encapsulating command like
*time* (or /usr/bin/time)
with some switch to get the desired values (--verbose is nice).
Or to monitor some parallel utilities like *top*.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
