 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 29/02/16 a las 15:44, Norbert Kern escribió:
> It's dark in caves - therefore I'm used to cave images lighted with
> torches, head lamps or other other point lights. I expect strong
> specular reflections and light fading - especially in humid caves.
>
> With this lighting the cave looks "flat" - I'm sure you are aware of
> this.
Yes, it was only a test render of the shapes, so I wanted everything
visible. The final lighting should be "natural", maybe looking from the
interior to the entrance with a sunny exterior, or perhaps with a hole
on the ceiling as Sven suggested. But the torches idea is tempting... ;)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 29/02/16 a las 17:00, Bald Eagle escribió:
> I'd say that shape-wise, you're off to a good start so far.
>
Thanks!
> Your material texturing probably needs to have some more ---
> differentiation. In my mind's eye, I conceive of layers and strata
> and veins of different minerals and sediments, and oxides, and
> benthic layers, etc. The homogeneous red-rust-brown looks like
> someone sprayed it with pigment or rusty water.
Yes, it was just the first texture I came up with... but making
something remotely credible in geological terms is going to be difficult.
> as for real caves - browse around and see what _you_ think.
> https://www.google.com/search?q=caves
I already did that search, and it's bookmarked for reference. :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 29/02/16 a las 18:05, Sven Littkowski escribió:
> Here my suggestion for the illumination:
>
> an irregular hole somewhere at the ceiling, where some light rays
> come in and are even visible in the dusty air inside the cave. Some
> radiosity and air that distributes the light further.
Yes, that was one of my first ideas for the lighting. It's the most
"pretty" among the candidates.
> Maybe a seedling or small plant in the center of the light. :-)
Maybe a crystal cluster better? ;)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 29/02/16 a las 18:01, Sven Littkowski escribió:
> My method would have been to create an iso surface and divide this
> from a box. The resulting difference would be the cave.
I discarded that one without testing it first, because in my mind it
sounded way too slow to render.
> For the stalagtites and -mites I would have used blobs.
I've thought about blobs, as I did use them for a cavern on a very old
IRTC entry... they can give more realistic "accumulative" shapes, but I
fear they will look too smooth.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aol com> wrote:
> Just a gentle reminder that TC-RTC finishes today (GMT) and all entries
> need to be rated. :-)
>
> --
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Oh, I'd rated last week. Since most guys sent 2 or 3 images, I don't expect a
number of ratings anywhere near of the number of entries.
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> I discarded that one without testing it first, because in my mind it
> sounded way too slow to render.
Can you do the difference, convert it to a mesh, and THEN render it?
Maybe use a heightfield?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 29/02/16 a las 19:41, Bald Eagle escribió:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>> I discarded that one without testing it first, because in my mind
>> it sounded way too slow to render.
>
> Can you do the difference, convert it to a mesh, and THEN render it?
I would kill for a simple way to do that... converting isosurfaces to
meshes.
> Maybe use a heightfield?
I thought about making it with several hf's rotated around, but it
would still lack the "overhangs" that isosurfaces allow.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/29/2016 6:09 PM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> El 29/02/16 a las 14:54, Stephen escribió:
>> On 2/29/2016 12:40 PM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>>> Well, after looking at images from these amazing caves, I hope
>>> you're joking... it would be terrifically difficult to go for
>>> something even remotely resembling that.
>>
>>
>> They do use coloured lights around the rocks and in the water, you
>> know. :-)
>>
>
> Yes, I know... I was referring to the intricate shapes of the
> stalagmites and stalactites.
>
They look pretty good to me.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> El 29/02/16 a las 19:41, Bald Eagle escribió:
> > Can you do the difference, convert it to a mesh, and THEN render it?
>
> I would kill for a simple way to do that... converting isosurfaces to
> meshes.
Are you aware of Kevin Loney's isosurface approximation?
http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/isotut/approx.htm
The site links to the long dead Geocities for the source, but there appears to
be a new site, which I haven't investigated:
http://www.winsite.com/Multimedia/3D-Modeling-CAD/Isosurface/
A version updated by Jaap Frank and Tor Olav Kristensen is available at p.b.s-f:
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3C47cc76fd%40news.povray.org%3E/
I have had mixed results with it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> I thought about making it with several hf's rotated around, but it
> would still lack the "overhangs" that isosurfaces allow.
Why not use reasonable fast isosurfaces?
Sometimes Samuel T. Benge's Isorender approach gives good results
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.525dcd797919e005c8060b460@news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=40
4955&toff=50).
Here are two examples with my "universal test scene".
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'iso-tests.jpg' (526 KB)
Preview of image 'iso-tests.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 01/03/16 a las 05:12, Cousin Ricky escribió:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>> El 29/02/16 a las 19:41, Bald Eagle escribió:
>>> Can you do the difference, convert it to a mesh, and THEN render
>>> it?
>>
>> I would kill for a simple way to do that... converting isosurfaces
>> to meshes.
>
> Are you aware of Kevin Loney's isosurface approximation?
No, and it's strange, because something like this should have sparked
my interest and I would have tested it.
> I have had mixed results with it.
>
Well, lets see how it works with pigment-based isosurfaces... I hope
it works, because if not, a lot of features are going to be missing on
my cave.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 01/03/16 a las 06:55, Norbert Kern escribió:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>> I thought about making it with several hf's rotated around, but it
>> would still lack the "overhangs" that isosurfaces allow.
>
>
>
> Why not use reasonable fast isosurfaces? Sometimes Samuel T. Benge's
> Isorender approach gives good results
This one I remember now... but somehow I never played with it and got
lost on my memory. I might have some uses for it on the cave, no doubt.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Another cave test... with more stalactites, a better lighting and fast
radiosity. It renders a bit faster than before, because I found some
silly things I was doing with the stalactites/stalagmites isosurfaces,
and also reduced max_gradient to 3.
I tested the approx include, but found they are not very practical for
my usage of isosurfaces here (I'm using a different isosurface for each
stalactite/stalagmite, and there are a lot). I will stick to isosurfaces
for the moment...
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-06-3h45m.jpg' (258 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-06-3h45m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Aaah! You are getting somewhere. I love this cave.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote on 02/03/2016 12.00:
> Another cave test... with more stalactites, a better lighting and fast
> radiosity. It renders a bit faster than before, because I found some
> silly things I was doing with the stalactites/stalagmites isosurfaces,
> and also reduced max_gradient to 3.
>
> I tested the approx include, but found they are not very practical for
> my usage of isosurfaces here (I'm using a different isosurface for each
> stalactite/stalagmite, and there are a lot). I will stick to isosurfaces
> for the moment...
>
> --
> jaime
It begins to become an interesting place... and the light is very good!
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A vast improvement, and I'm glad you found a few places to speed up the render.
It will be interesting to see your textures, contrasts and myriad thoughtful
enhancements as this progresses.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/02/2016 09:15 AM, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>
> It begins to become an interesting place... and the light is very good!
> ;-)
> Paolo
I had those exact thoughts on seeing this latest image! :-)
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, I like it now more than before, too.
Just - the large crystal in the left foreground is somehow lost and not
fitting (all others are). And another observation: all stalactites and
-mites have too much the same triangular shape. When I was in caves, I
observed some which were like irregular columns, not so triangular. And
they had very wet, smooth surfaces, glossy because of the wetness, and
also levels of different colors because at different times different
minerals were in the water that run down on them.
Maybe, instead of the crystal, a little water pit..?
I try to imagine, the illumination at the background is caused by some
cave entrance on its right side and catches the late afternoon sun
(golden). Seeing light rays coming from the right side in the dusty cave
air would improve that imagination. I like the idea, to be in the darker
area and see the illuminated area in the distance, just the way you are
doing it now. :-)
Hmmm, what about a few fluorescent tiny insects or worms, seen just as
dim greenish-yellow light dots in the darker areas? :-D
Or somewhere a part of a hidden treasure chest (not leveled but a bit
diagonal in its positioning), open and full of gold coins of which some
came out and lay on the ground around it?
On 02.03.2016 06:00, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Another cave test... with more stalactites, a better lighting and fast
> radiosity.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 02/03/16 a las 13:32, Thomas de Groot escribió:
> Aaah! You are getting somewhere.
Yes... underground.
> I love this cave.
Thanks!
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 02/03/16 a las 16:00, William F Pokorny escribió:
> On 03/02/2016 09:15 AM, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
>>
>> It begins to become an interesting place... and the light is very
>> good! ;-) Paolo
>
> I had those exact thoughts on seeing this latest image! :-)
>
> Bill P.
>
Thanks to both! The lighting is supposed to be: daylight from the
rear-right, and a torch or lantern and the interior.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 02/03/16 a las 15:19, Bald Eagle escribió:
> A vast improvement, and I'm glad you found a few places to speed up
> the render.
Thanks. I just found a way to speed it up a lot: meshrelief.inc by
Bill Pragnell:
http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
Just another thing I somehow missed until today.
> It will be interesting to see your textures, contrasts and myriad
> thoughtful enhancements as this progresses.
And a lot of fun for me, no doubt... :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 02/03/16 a las 16:00, Sven Littkowski escribió:
> Just - the large crystal in the left foreground is somehow lost and
> not fitting (all others are).
The crystals where thrown at random, and should have keep them out at
this moment of the development, but could not resist.
> And another observation: all stalactites and -mites have too much the
> same triangular shape. When I was in caves, I observed some which
> were like irregular columns, not so triangular.
Yes, specially stalagmites should be more round and irregular.
> Hmmm, what about a few fluorescent tiny insects or worms, seen just
> as dim greenish-yellow light dots in the darker areas? :-D
Maybe... sounds nice, but don't know if the effect would be really
recognizable.
> Or somewhere a part of a hidden treasure chest (not leveled but a
> bit diagonal in its positioning), open and full of gold coins of
> which some came out and lay on the ground around it?
>
That would be way too typical, I guess... but who knows what I will
find there? :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 02/03/16 a las 18:56, Jaime Vives Piqueres escribió:
> http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
I just had to add: WOW! What a piece of work!
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/2/2016 5:40 PM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> El 02/03/16 a las 18:56, Jaime Vives Piqueres escribió:
>
>> http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
>
> I just had to add: WOW! What a piece of work!
That site is pretty impressive.
Awesome stone here (but I don't like the girl)
http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/gallery6/beforeafter.jpg
But I love the girl here
http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/gallery6/ghostlight.jpg
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Surprise us! :-)
On 02.03.2016 13:01, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> That would be way too typical, I guess... but who knows what I will
> find there? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nothing really new in a visual sense, but this image uses now meshes
instead isosurfaces, thanks to meshrelief.inc by Bill Pragnell. Maybe
the detail is not as great, but is very similar and the render time has
dropped insanely (this one has bigger size, more objects, focal blur,
and it renders just under half an hour). Maybe now I will be able to add
translucency and some wet-surfaces effect.
(Yes, I know I overdid the focal blur and it looks like a toy cave... :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-09b-27m.jpg' (236 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-09b-27m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5-3-2016 10:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Nothing really new in a visual sense, but this image uses now meshes
> instead isosurfaces, thanks to meshrelief.inc by Bill Pragnell. Maybe
> the detail is not as great, but is very similar and the render time has
> dropped insanely (this one has bigger size, more objects, focal blur,
> and it renders just under half an hour). Maybe now I will be able to add
> translucency and some wet-surfaces effect.
>
> (Yes, I know I overdid the focal blur and it looks like a toy cave... :)
>
I love toy caves. ;-) This one looks very believable. Good job indeed.
It has been some time since I used meshrelief last but it is a nice and
useful tool.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/5/2016 4:05 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> and it looks like a toy cave... :)
It does. It looks like something Aardman would build.
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trying the rocks/stalagmites/stalactites code on a different cave with a
bit more complex geometry. Works, but tracing from a central point isn't
the best method for the rocks... will try hg-povray next for a different
approach.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-02-21m.jpg' (179 KB)
Download 'the-cave-ii-03-26m.jpg' (198 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-02-21m.jpg'
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-03-26m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, the structures certainly have improved a lot! I like it. Try to use
less stalactites and -mites in the middle, or shorter ones, so the view
to the illuminated part is better.
On 05.03.2016 04:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Nothing really new in a visual sense, but this image uses now meshes
> instead isosurfaces, thanks to meshrelief.inc by Bill Pragnell. Maybe
> the detail is not as great, but is very similar and the render time has
> dropped insanely (this one has bigger size, more objects, focal blur,
> and it renders just under half an hour). Maybe now I will be able to add
> translucency and some wet-surfaces effect.
>
> (Yes, I know I overdid the focal blur and it looks like a toy cave... :)
>
> --
> jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
looks promising.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-06-3h42m.jpg' (111 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-06-3h42m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-3-2016 8:17, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
It does indeed.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote on 08/03/2016 8.17:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
> --
> jaime
This one is magnificent!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> El 02/03/16 a las 18:56, Jaime Vives Piqueres escribió:
>
> > http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
>
> I just had to add: WOW! What a piece of work!
>
> --
> jaime
I was persuaded. Will try it one day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
(model from archive3d.net)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-07-46m.jpg' (146 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-07-46m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9-3-2016 21:00, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
>
>
> (model from archive3d.net)
>
LOL. Well done. Your cave is amazing.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 10/03/16 a las 08:56, Thomas de Groot escribió:
> LOL. Well done. Your cave is amazing.
Thanks... it's also amazingly fast to render.
BTW, for the moment the speleologist only found some mist there. And
only took him 8 additional minutes... :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-07b-52m.jpg' (118 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-07b-52m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-3-2016 9:22, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> El 10/03/16 a las 08:56, Thomas de Groot escribió:
>> LOL. Well done. Your cave is amazing.
>
> Thanks... it's also amazingly fast to render.
>
> BTW, for the moment the speleologist only found some mist there. And
> only took him 8 additional minutes... :)
>
Yes, that was missing indeed.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08.03.2016 02:17, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
> --
> jaime
I told you. :-)
Wooowww!!!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08.03.2016 02:17, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
> --
> jaime
Hmmmmm, maybe a touch more afternoonish (a bit more golden or orange or
yellow color for the light). Well, in fact, you could experiment with
any light color, from sunrise to sunset.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09.03.2016 15:00, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
>
>
> (model from archive3d.net)
>
> --
> jaime
>
Or another idea: a wooden walk way, with planks from left to right, and
a railing. Not straight, but in curves around some of the stone
formations. Maybe even tiny orange lamps on some of the railing posts.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10.03.2016 07:30, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 10-3-2016 9:22, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> El 10/03/16 a las 08:56, Thomas de Groot escribió:
>>> LOL. Well done. Your cave is amazing.
>>
>> Thanks... it's also amazingly fast to render.
>>
>> BTW, for the moment the speleologist only found some mist there. And
>> only took him 8 additional minutes... :)
>>
>
> Yes, that was missing indeed.
>
>
Instead of the scientist in his yellow rubber raincoat, do a rope
hanging down where the light is, and two persons coming down on the
rope, sportler dress or so.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 13-3-2016 6:36, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>
>
> On 09.03.2016 15:00, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
>>
>>
>> (model from archive3d.net)
>>
>> --
>> jaime
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Or another idea: a wooden walk way, with planks from left to right, and
> a railing. Not straight, but in curves around some of the stone
> formations. Maybe even tiny orange lamps on some of the railing posts.
>
baaah! The tourist trap!
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>
> baaah! The tourist trap!
>
> --
> Thomas
That's what destroyed Lascaux. :(
"Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine, lest
they trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you in pieces."
There is much truth to that good advice. I've experienced it firsthand.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> El 02/03/16 a las 18:56, Jaime Vives Piqueres escribió:
>
> > http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
>
> I just had to add: WOW! What a piece of work!
Haha, thanks! I'm glad it's found some use by someone as productive as yourself
:)
This is exactly the sort of project it was intended for.
I somehow missed this thread, your cave images are superb.
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> Trying the rocks/stalagmites/stalactites code on a different cave with a
> bit more complex geometry. Works, but tracing from a central point isn't
> the best method for the rocks... will try hg-povray next for a different
> approach.
A little late to the party here... I am curious to know how many distinct meshes
you created for the cave. Were you able to build them all during parse, or did
you use the mesh include saving feature? Are there any pure isosurfaces left?
Really nice work though!
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 22/03/16 a las 21:59, Bill Pragnell escribió:
> Haha, thanks! I'm glad it's found some use by someone as productive
> as yourself :) This is exactly the sort of project it was intended
> for.
>
> I somehow missed this thread, your cave images are superb.
Thanks, and yes: this kind of project was greatly benefited in terms
of render speed and easy control of the shapes.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 22/03/16 a las 22:14, Bill Pragnell escribió:
> A little late to the party here... I am curious to know how many
> distinct meshes you created for the cave. Were you able to build them
> all during parse, or did you use the mesh include saving feature? Are
> there any pure isosurfaces left?
>
I did precompute two version of the stalagmites, two of the
stalactites, and just one for the rocks. In the case of the stalagmites
and stalactites I just randomly pick of the two version. For the rocks,
the only mesh is randomly rotated and randomly scaled in all directions
to make it look like different rocks. And no, no isosurfaces where
harmed for the later version.... :)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dick balaska <dic### [at] buckosoftcom> wrote:
> That site is pretty impressive.
Glad you like it. I haven't updated it for about 5 years now (although I have
been far less productive of late, so there's only experiments and simple scenes
to add really). I keep meaning to redo it in a cleaner style and make it easier
to add content, but so much to do and so little time...
> Awesome stone here (but I don't like the girl)
Yeah sorry I went a bit mad for posable humans for a brief time, but was never
patient enough to sort out the clothes... doesn't help that the model is
actually an anime-style non-realistic figure. The brickwork was the main goal of
the mesh macros that Jaime has been using so well recently. Quick renders,
realistic shapes.
> But I love the girl here
Also my favourite. Although I cocked up the caustics behind the glassware, which
still bugs me :)
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 2016-03-22 20:08, also sprach Bill Pragnell:
> Also my favourite. Although I cocked up the caustics behind the glassware, which
> still bugs me :)
Ah, boo! You ruined it for me. :P
I didn't notice, I was really focused on the middle third of the pic.
Looking again, you need titles on the bottom two rows of books too. The
green row in particular looks too much like "copy object".
Still a great pic.
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
