![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 1-12-2013 9:11, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Another advantage of blurred reflection: you can combine it with
> micronormals if you feel your scenes still render too fast... ;)
Ah, why not indeed? I always try to increase render time ;-)
>
> BTW, the new aa is doing very fine on this one (+a0.0 +am3).
Absolutely.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 12/01/2013 03:11 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Another advantage of blurred reflection: you can combine it with
> micronormals if you feel your scenes still render too fast... ;)
>
> BTW, the new aa is doing very fine on this one (+a0.0 +am3).
>
> --
> jaime
nice variation on the original scene!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I can't help it, I still do like your original image with its beautiful
clean raytraced reflections much more. But the new garland is indeed
better ;)
-Ive
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
The last is really a good image, Christmas come... I don't say the two others
are bad, they are just less impressive.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Another advantage of blurred reflection: you can combine it with
> micronormals if you feel your scenes still render too fast... ;)
I've never seen baubles like this but very nice ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>
>> Another advantage of blurred reflection: you can combine it with
>> micronormals if you feel your scenes still render too fast... ;)
>
> I've never seen baubles like this but very nice ;)
Yes, they must be rare because I was not able to find any reference
images, but I remember having one of these on my hands many years ago:
it looked like it was done with a lot of metallic yarn, very thin and
wired very tight.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I can't help it, I still do like your original image with its beautiful
> clean raytraced reflections much more.
Yeah... if something fits perfect raytraced reflections, it must be
christmas baubles.
> But the new garland is indeed better ;)
It's just bigger, but as they say: bigger it's better. ;)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 12/01/2013 03:11 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Another advantage of blurred reflection: you can combine it with
> micronormals if you feel your scenes still render too fast... ;)
>
> BTW, the new aa is doing very fine on this one (+a0.0 +am3).
>
> --
> jaime
Cool. I too remember ornaments like this from years past.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |