 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/09/2013 7:22 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>
> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
Garfield's bunny cousin.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-9-2013 20:22, James Holsenback wrote:
> On 09/01/2013 04:27 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>> I like this guys expression and I need a caption for a text object ...
>> something clever, something deep (well not too) , maybe Freudian
>
> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
>
> I did however manage to get the model cleaned up. Took /more/ than
> several tries ... got easier once I removed all the duplicate vertices,
> and fulled in a few missing faces. The smooth vertex and mesh modifiers
> started working properly. The final gotcha was when export as 3ds failed
> to pick up the teeth. Exporting as obj did the trick!
>
> Still searching for a caption tho ...
Bald hare
--
Everytime the IT department forbids something that a researcher deems
necessary for her work there will be another hole in the firewall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/03/2013 03:59 PM, andrel wrote:
> On 3-9-2013 20:22, James Holsenback wrote:
>> On 09/01/2013 04:27 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>> I like this guys expression and I need a caption for a text object ...
>>> something clever, something deep (well not too) , maybe Freudian
>>
>> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
>>
>> I did however manage to get the model cleaned up. Took /more/ than
>> several tries ... got easier once I removed all the duplicate vertices,
>> and fulled in a few missing faces. The smooth vertex and mesh modifiers
>> started working properly. The final gotcha was when export as 3ds failed
>> to pick up the teeth. Exporting as obj did the trick!
>>
>> Still searching for a caption tho ...
>
> Bald hare
>
good one ... I had considered Bad Hare Day, so I can appreciate your pun
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/03/2013 03:23 PM, Stephen wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 7:22 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>
>> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
>
> Garfield's bunny cousin.
>
OK ... so a Garfield-ism it is!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'work.png' (791 KB)
Preview of image 'work.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
James Holsenback <nom### [at] none com> wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:23 PM, Stephen wrote:
> > On 03/09/2013 7:22 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> >>
> >> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
> >
> > Garfield's bunny cousin.
> >
> OK ... so a Garfield-ism it is!
I don't know, lasagne is /Garfield's/ favorite food... try carrot cake.
Nice character :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/03/2013 06:33 PM, Samuel Benge wrote:
> James Holsenback <nom### [at] nonecom> wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 03:23 PM, Stephen wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2013 7:22 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
>>>
>>> Garfield's bunny cousin.
>>>
>> OK ... so a Garfield-ism it is!
>
> I don't know, lasagne is /Garfield's/ favorite food... try carrot cake.
>
> Nice character :)
>
Thanks ... was just indulging Stephen. I like this version better:
http://jholsenback.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/will-work-for-carrots/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/09/2013 10:11 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 03:23 PM, Stephen wrote:
>> On 03/09/2013 7:22 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>>>
>>> Well thanks folks for the caption attempts ... but I'm not feeling it!
>>
>> Garfield's bunny cousin.
>>
> OK ... so a Garfield-ism it is!
LOL
On the sadder side. When in NM a couple of years ago, I actually saw
someone with a sign that said. I'll was your car for doughnuts.
Roswell, where aliens come for a cheap wax job. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 04/09/2013 2:27 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> Thanks ... was just indulging Stephen.
You can't do enough of that. Or so my wife says. ;-)
> I like this version better:
>
> http://jholsenback.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/will-work-for-carrots/
That's good too.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 04/09/2013 2:27 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> > Thanks ... was just indulging Stephen.
>
> You can't do enough of that. Or so my wife says. ;-)
>
> > I like this version better:
> >
> > http://jholsenback.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/will-work-for-carrots/
>
> That's good too.
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Stephen
J.F. K-Rot is here!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/05/2013 03:24 AM, Fractracer wrote:
> J.F. K-Rot is here!
indeed!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
