 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: POVAGRA - Buy Now! No povscription needed!
Date: 25 Oct 2012 10:07:31
Message: <508947a3$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-10-2012 9:46, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Trough official means, yes, you will need a povscription. But this a
> Spam-advertised offering to illegally buy original capsules through an
> unscrupulous third party (that's me: just send 250 POV units and I will
> send you 2 pots, plus a pack of graph paper and a measuring tape keyring).
250 POV units? That's pretty cheap, but what guarantee do I have that
you have not tinkered with the capsules? Diluted with strongly
compressed jpeg's for instance...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: POVAGRA - Buy Now! No povscription needed!
Date: 25 Oct 2012 11:54:41
Message: <508960c1$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/10/12 16:07, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> 250 POV units? That's pretty cheap, but what guarantee do I have that
> you have not tinkered with the capsules? Diluted with strongly
> compressed jpeg's for instance...
Casually, I was thinking about making the capsules transparent, and
filling them with basic primitives... would that be enough guarantee? :)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
oh, that explains your vigorous and stiff raytracing despite all these years ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: POVAGRA - Buy Now! No povscription needed!
Date: 26 Oct 2012 02:45:07
Message: <508a3173$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-10-2012 17:54, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Casually, I was thinking about making the capsules transparent, and
> filling them with basic primitives... would that be enough guarantee? :)
LOL, heptahedrons would be fine....
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> "The primary indication of Povagra is treatment of inspirational
> dysfunction (inability to sustain a satisfactory inspiration to complete
> the making of a scene)."
>
> "In clinical trials, the most common adverse effects of Povagra use
> included headache, flushing, dyspepsia, nasal congestion and impaired
> vision, including photophobia and blurred vision, so hardcore POV-Ray
> users have nothing to fear."
>
> --
> Jaime
After two hard days of detailed organisational planning (with non-open
reorganisation) and (of course not-only-)factual dispute this was the first
laugh I did -
thank you Jaimes
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
pretty. per usual. we all bow to your prowess.
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> Was going to be just a simple pills scene, but you guess what popped up
> when I searched from prescription label images.... ;)
>
> --
> Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Finally - it's about time!
I've been stuck using those generic, Deep Blue, C-alis tablets.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: POVAGRA - Buy Now! No povscription needed!
Date: 9 Oct 2014 04:06:21
Message: <543641fd@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> pretty. per usual. we all bow to your prowess.
>
A bit late, but thanks... you reminded me that I've not done anything
worth for almost two years. :(
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> A bit late, but thanks... you reminded me that I've not done anything
> worth for almost two years. :(
>
> Jaime
I'ld never support your opinion in this direction, but reminding to publish more
sources should be allowed (at least the ones I asked for ...).
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: POVAGRA - Buy Now! No povscription needed!
Date: 11 Oct 2014 06:02:46
Message: <54390046@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>> A bit late, but thanks... you reminded me that I've not done anything
>> worth for almost two years. :(
>>
>> Jaime
>
>
> I'ld never support your opinion in this direction, but reminding to publish more
> sources should be allowed (at least the ones I asked for ...).
>
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
