![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
My first subsurface test. The fact that it does not resemble
a strawberry at all only shows how easily I get sidetracked ;)
I couldn't quite get rid of the graininess even when increasing
subsurface samples to 500, and AA also didn't seem to help. In the
end I opted for 100 and used weak focal blur to smoothen it a bit.
Rendered in 25 minutes using 12 threads (and no I wasn't patient
enough to try this with radiosity enabled).
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'goo.jpg' (95 KB)
Preview of image 'goo.jpg'
![goo.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C505f50ff%40news.povray.org%3E/goo.jpg?ttop=443866&toff=1750&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 09/23/2012 02:12 PM, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> My first subsurface test. The fact that it does not resemble
> a strawberry at all only shows how easily I get sidetracked ;)
LOL ... can relate to that! Hey but sometimes getting sidetracked
produces some interesting results ... I like it!
> I couldn't quite get rid of the graininess even when increasing
> subsurface samples to 500, and AA also didn't seem to help. In the
> end I opted for 100 and used weak focal blur to smoothen it a bit.
>
> Rendered in 25 minutes using 12 threads (and no I wasn't patient
> enough to try this with radiosity enabled).
Not too bad ... raytracing and patience definitely belong in the same
sentence.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/09/2012 7:20 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
>
> Not too bad ... raytracing and patience definitely belong in the same
> sentence.
As does frustration. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/09/2012 7:12 PM, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> My first subsurface test. The fact that it does not resemble
> a strawberry at all only shows how easily I get sidetracked ;)
You are right it does not resemble a strawberry, for a start
strawberries are red or strawberry coloured. :-P
It does have a certain charm in a "I don't want to be in the same room
as it" way.
Is it an isosurface, blob or what?
It's worth continuing with, I think.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/09/2012 7:47 PM, Stephen wrote:
> Is it an isosurface, blob or what?
I really should read the subject. :-(
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
James Holsenback wrote:
> Not too bad ... raytracing and patience definitely belong in the same
> sentence.
It wouldn't be so bad if I could get some work done while rendering.
But then I'm constantly peeking to the povray output, checking progress,
admiring the newest pixel block ...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen wrote:
> You are right it does not resemble a strawberry, for a start
> strawberries are red or strawberry coloured. :-P
Well I actually DO have a strawberry WIP that is red, see attachment ;)
But it's mostly an elaborate texture on a plain blob and nothing much
remains of the strawberriness when normals are removed as happended when
adding subsurface so I ended up with the other test scene. Not sure I
want to render a bowl full of isosurface strawberries, though ...
> It does have a certain charm in a "I don't want to be in the same room
> as it" way.
Yes Iit could be called repulsive sphere over checkered plane ;)
> Is it an isosurface, blob or what?
As you found out by now, it is an isosurface (sphere - leopard).
> It's worth continuing with, I think.
Well let's see if I make it back to the strawberry first ;)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'strawberry-verywip.jpg' (76 KB)
Preview of image 'strawberry-verywip.jpg'
![strawberry-verywip.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C505f5ec9%40news.povray.org%3E/strawberry-verywip.jpg?ttop=443866&toff=1750&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 23/09/2012 8:10 PM, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> You are right it does not resemble a strawberry, for a start
>> strawberries are red or strawberry coloured. :-P
>
> Well I actually DO have a strawberry WIP that is red, see attachment ;)
>
I like that. :-)
> But it's mostly an elaborate texture on a plain blob and nothing much
> remains of the strawberriness when normals are removed as happended when
> adding subsurface so I ended up with the other test scene. Not sure I
> want to render a bowl full of isosurface strawberries, though ...
>
Well if you have nothing else to do. :-)
>> It does have a certain charm in a "I don't want to be in the same room
>> as it" way.
>
> Yes Iit could be called repulsive sphere over checkered plane ;)
>
I like that. :-D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 23.09.2012 20:51, schrieb Christian Froeschlin:
> James Holsenback wrote:
>
>> Not too bad ... raytracing and patience definitely belong in the same
>> sentence.
>
> It wouldn't be so bad if I could get some work done while rendering.
> But then I'm constantly peeking to the povray output, checking progress,
> admiring the newest pixel block ...
Been there, done that! :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> Stephen wrote:
>
>> You are right it does not resemble a strawberry, for a start
>> strawberries are red or strawberry coloured. :-P
>
> Well I actually DO have a strawberry WIP that is red, see attachment ;)
>
> But it's mostly an elaborate texture on a plain blob and nothing much
> remains of the strawberriness when normals are removed as happended when
> adding subsurface so I ended up with the other test scene. Not sure I
> want to render a bowl full of isosurface strawberries, though ...
>
A bowl full of isosurface strawberies... It won't be THAT long to render
as only a few will be fully visible, some only partialy visible and
replacable with a simple blob, and many totaly, or almost totaly hiden
that could be totaly removed or relaced with simple primitives.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |