![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 08/03/2011 12:45 PM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 08:20 AM, Stephen wrote:
>> spotlight with the sun in your lightdome for a start and maybe a hint of
>
> getting slightly better results using a different image in light dome,
> (cityscape) ... I like the overhead spot look, so maybe the out in the
> open sunset like I was using before was a poor choice.
>
More than likely. An indoor light probe would be better. Somewhere out
there, there is a bedroom probe but for the life of me I can't find it.
>> atomiser seems a bit foreshortened due to looking down on it.
>
> yep that's exactly what was bugging me!
>
If the scene does not take long to render then experiment.
>> I like the doily is it an image_map?
>
> yes it is ... found a suitable image that had a black background. pulled
> it into gimp and sampled the doily (real close up) in a couple of places
> until I was able to get pretty much all of it ... then pasted it into an
> image with transparent background
>
It looks as it has depth. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 08.03.2011 11:32, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> some improvements overs the first attempt ...
To be honest I liked the first ground texture better; it had more
"style", somehow.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> > getting slightly better results using a different image in light dome,
> > (cityscape) ... I like the overhead spot look, so maybe the out in the
> > open sunset like I was using before was a poor choice.
>
> More than likely. An indoor light probe would be better. Somewhere out
> there, there is a bedroom probe but for the life of me I can't find it.
Here's another lightprobe I shot a while ago, this time inside the lobby of the
Auckland Business School. I've used it before in images I posted here.
http://s3.edouard.info/ak-business-school.hdr
Cheers,
Edouard.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Edouard" <pov### [at] edouard info> wrote:
> Here's another lightprobe I shot a while ago, this time inside the lobby of the
> Auckland Business School. I've used it before in images I posted here.
>
> http://s3.edouard.info/ak-business-school.hdr
>
> Cheers,
> Edouard.
Nice one, thanks :)
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |