 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dlm napsal(a):
> "jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
> news:web.476b53e2be20955132ce44a40@news.povray.org...
>> stbenge <stb### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>>
>> A lot of people I know can't see these things for some reason. The easiest
>> way
>> is to focus on something further behind image. I tell people to look at
>> the
>> wall behind the monitor and let their peripheral vision make out the image
>> and
>> then slowly move focus back to the monitor. After enough training, they
>> can do
>> it without looking beyond the monitor first.
>>
>
> Simply brillo!
>
> I am one of those people with great depth perception, but I have great
> difficulty merging regular stereo views.
> For this however I got it in short order. My technique was quite different
> to some suggested above:
>
> Get up really close to the monitor.
> Stare through it.
> Slowly move your head away to about 1 foot moving sightly from side to side
> as you go.
> Those edges pop into focus as you go.
> Once you have a lock on the 3D picture, its easiest to hold if you keep your
> head moving a little.
> At this point you can comfortably retreat to your normal viewing position.
>
> Thanks Sam,
>
> DLM
>
>
I thought my depth perception was bad because of watching stereograms
too much.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dlm wrote:
> Get up really close to the monitor.
> Stare through it.
> Slowly move your head away to about 1 foot moving sightly from side to side
> as you go.
that's more or less what works best for me too, except
I stay very close until the eyes adjust a bit and don't
move sideways as it distracts me too much.
First attempt it took me 3 minutes to get it into focus,
which was exactly time for the screen-saver to kick in.
That starfield simulation sure looked odd then ;)
Great Job!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dlm wrote:
> Get up really close to the monitor.
> Stare through it.
> Slowly move your head away to about 1 foot moving sightly from side to side
> as you go.
> Those edges pop into focus as you go.
> Once you have a lock on the 3D picture, its easiest to hold if you keep your
> head moving a little.
Oh wow! This is the first time in my LIFE I've EVER been able to see one
of these things. For many years I was actually convinced the whole thing
was an 'Emporer's new clothes' scam. But using this technique, I've
FINALLY seen an image inside the mess!
Thankyou!
Cheers!
Rick Measham
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
dlm wrote:
> Simply brillo!
Thanks!
> I am one of those people with great depth perception, but I have great
> difficulty merging regular stereo views.
> For this however I got it in short order.
>
> Thanks Sam,
No problem :) The code for it should be ready soon.
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> First attempt it took me 3 minutes to get it into focus,
> which was exactly time for the screen-saver to kick in.
> That starfield simulation sure looked odd then ;)
>
> Great Job!
Thank you!
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Rick Measham wrote:
>
> Oh wow! This is the first time in my LIFE I've EVER been able to see one
> of these things. For many years I was actually convinced the whole thing
> was an 'Emporer's new clothes' scam. But using this technique, I've
> FINALLY seen an image inside the mess!
>
> Thankyou!
Wow, thanks. I didn't realize my technique was any kind of improvement
over the traditional way.
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stbenge nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/12/22 17:23:
> Rick Measham wrote:
>>
>> Oh wow! This is the first time in my LIFE I've EVER been able to see
>> one of these things. For many years I was actually convinced the whole
>> thing was an 'Emporer's new clothes' scam. But using this technique,
>> I've FINALLY seen an image inside the mess!
>>
>> Thankyou!
>
> Wow, thanks. I didn't realize my technique was any kind of improvement
> over the traditional way.
>
> Sam
There are many techniques possible. The one that works best for you may be
totaly useless for the guy next to you.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That was way cool! It didn't take me long to see it, unlike those in books and
posters where I had to stare at them for what seem to be forever LOL. Nice job
:)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lace nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/12/23 02:18:
> That was way cool! It didn't take me long to see it, unlike those in books and
> posters where I had to stare at them for what seem to be forever LOL. Nice job
> :)
>
>
>
Many peoples find it easier to perceive the image with stereograms on a computer
screen rather than printed.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
EVERYTHING HAS A GENDER
You may not know this but many nonliving things have a gender...
A Hot Air Balloon is Male, because, to get it to go anywhere, you have to light
a fire under it, and of course, there's the hot air part.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lace wrote:
> That was way cool! It didn't take me long to see it, unlike those in books and
> posters where I had to stare at them for what seem to be forever LOL. Nice job
> :)
Glad you liked it, Lacie :)
Sam
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
