|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:46db25fd$1@news.povray.org...
>> But that's more or less how I viewed it in the first instance...
>> (Apart
>> from the planet was a bit dark, but the space station looked fine to me
>> on
>> my monitor).
>>
> That's not a space station, it's a light cruiser!
Heh, ok, I'm not familiar with all these space vehicle names. :)
~Steve~
> Jerome
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Groves wrote:
>
>> That's not a space station, it's a light cruiser!
> With a goofy weapon load. Hemphill was on drugs when she ordered this
> refit.
>
Well, it worked, didn't it? ;) Well ok, just once but still...
>> BTW, I checked the schematics in the books and the hammerheads are
>> too large. They're supposed to be nearly flush with the impeler
>> rings on top and bottom and only slightly larger on the sides. Other
>> than that (and the gray color of the hull instead of white) it's a
>> pretty good model. Keep it up!
>
> The colour was purest white, but there's not a lot of illumination. As
> to the hammerheads, the sizes were based on measurements given in an
> online resource I probably shouldn't have trusted. Note that they are
> almost flush with the impeller rings on top and bottom; it's to port
> and starboard that they stick out further.
Even on top and bottom, they stick out by nearly the radius of the
impeller ring! In the books I have, the impeller nodes stick further
out than the hammerheads on top and bottom. In fact, your vertical
dimension would be nearly right for the horizontal dimension (should
be just a teeny tiny bit more).
Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
| mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
| http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG3EMzd0kWM4JG3k8RAhYHAJwLcyJJc0u75XmjXmwJYeegMFT1IACfQze6
f7gU33+NGWuievQJS3BCTqo=
=kYel
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Even on top and bottom, they stick out by nearly the radius of the
> impeller ring! In the books I have, the impeller nodes stick further
> out than the hammerheads on top and bottom. In fact, your vertical
> dimension would be nearly right for the horizontal dimension (should
> be just a teeny tiny bit more).
Okay. This better? :)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fearless.jpg' (467 KB)
Preview of image 'fearless.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Timothy Groves wrote:
>
>> Even on top and bottom, they stick out by nearly the radius of the
>> impeller ring! In the books I have, the impeller nodes stick further
>> out than the hammerheads on top and bottom. In fact, your vertical
>> dimension would be nearly right for the horizontal dimension (should
>> be just a teeny tiny bit more).
>
> Okay. This better? :)
>
;) Actually, I think it's still a bit too much on top and bottom.
OTOH, it's much too small side to side, but of course, you already
knew that :)
Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
| mailto:jeb### [at] freefr | ICQ: 238062172 |
| http://jeberger.free.fr/ | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG3cihd0kWM4JG3k8RAoJyAJ4kztDU9z8aw6VO+a0KzS3M0FXNSACfY945
eDsn4wBQjZyr6wxCMAxC1Iw=
=xj/e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |