 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
wrote:
>High!
>
>Stephen wrote:
>> Also I don't think men look good in tights :-) At
>> least not action men.
>
>...then you probably never saw Jethro Tull's Ian Anderson in action! ;-)
>
We have heard the chimes at midnight, Master Shallow.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> schreef in bericht
news:80io331iqoqr1do2qffuuldce19js0pckg@4ax.com...
>>
>
> We have heard the chimes at midnight, Master Shallow.
Yes, indeed, so we did, Master Falstaff... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 5 May 2007 15:51:59 +0200, "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet>
wrote:
>
>"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> schreef in bericht
>news:80io331iqoqr1do2qffuuldce19js0pckg@4ax.com...
>>>
>>
>> We have heard the chimes at midnight, Master Shallow.
>
>Yes, indeed, so we did, Master Falstaff... :-)
Nice one!
That reminds me I must give Tom Melly back his DVD before I start working in the
lowlands.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:463ba39f@news.povray.org...
>
> What if you made the figure a lost child?
Wouldn't fit with the feel of the scene I had in mind. The fact that the
feel hasn't come across properly is another issue.
> I know that you do some sci-fi writing too that has the same feel. It
> is like there is some aspect of scifi/fantasy action scenes that you are
> drawn to and want to recreate.
Most of the pictures I do have a story behind them, even if it's just a few
lines. I tend to find that picture and story come together.
They're not always action scenes, but I find those the eaiest to recreate.
> This scene, and scenes like it, have a voyeuristic component to them.
<snip>
Hmmm, interesting analysis. Not something that I thought of.
> I think your action/combat reflex is confusing here. That the scene is
> suddenly presented to the viewer just as it is revealed to the
> explorations of the little combat figure IS a typical scifi devise.
> But I wonder if you could push it further. There is something
> unsatisfying to me that it all ends with this unresponsive little turd
> with a gun.
I'm not fully satisfied with it either. I'll put it aside for a day or two,
see what comes to mind.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> Also I don't think men look good in tights :-) At
> least not action men.
Yeah, why don't you say that to Superman to his face! :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 5 May 2007 21:54:42 EDT, "Cousin Ricky" <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
>> Also I don't think men look good in tights :-) At
>> least not action men.
>
>Yeah, why don't you say that to Superman to his face! :-)
>
>
I will, after I get round to telling St Peter what I think of the set up down
here :-)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
> news:463ba39f@news.povray.org...
>
>>What if you made the figure a lost child?
>
>
> Wouldn't fit with the feel of the scene I had in mind.
Exactly, I'm trying to shake you up.
>
>
>>I know that you do some sci-fi writing too that has the same feel. It
>>is like there is some aspect of scifi/fantasy action scenes that you are
>>drawn to and want to recreate.
>
>
> Most of the pictures I do have a story behind them, even if it's just a few
> lines. I tend to find that picture and story come together.
Yes I remember a very early idea for a piece that involved a remarkable
shift in point of view utilizing a reflection somehow. At your best
your narrative inventions are very exciting.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <initialsurname@sentech sa dot com> wrote in message
news:4639119d@news.povray.org...
> Sorry, in my haste I attached the wrong vrsion of the image.
Aha! Now if you'd done that in the TC-RTC Gail, you would be able to go
into your account and make the wrong image 'dead', and then re-upload the
right image and make it 'live'! :o)
Nice image, btw. Are the bubbles randomly placed by hand? I think the
bubbles work well. I think I too would have the guy standing guard, but I
would also put some kind of machinery in front of him just to break that
bottom right-hand corner up a bit.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:464091c8@news.povray.org...
>
> Nice image, btw.
Thanks
> Are the bubbles randomly placed by hand?
No. It's a loop with a random seed for each column, which are then placed
semi-random in a circle.
I can post the macro if you want.
> I think the
> bubbles work well. I think I too would have the guy standing guard, but I
> would also put some kind of machinery in front of him just to break that
> bottom right-hand corner up a bit.
The idea of a guard sounds good, I just have to figure out how to make it
apparent that the people in the tanks aren't there volunterily.
My poser library is, unfortunatly, not that well stocked.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:464091c8@news.povray.org...
> into your account and make the wrong image 'dead', and then re-upload the
> right image and make it 'live'! :o)
Oops! Sorry, I meant 'suspend' instead of 'dead', and then 'make live'.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
