 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oops, now I went ahead and posted something here without posting
the supposedly mandatory RSOCP image first. So here we go:
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rsocp-800.jpg' (78 KB)
Preview of image 'rsocp-800.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote:
> Oops, now I went ahead and posted something here without posting
> the supposedly mandatory RSOCP image first. So here we go:
Ooh, fancy!
Is everyone who comes here supposed to post a RSOCP image?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:34:45 EST, "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>
>Is everyone who comes here supposed to post a RSOCP image?
>
Yes, it's mandatory. Now that you've posted a message without posting a RSOCP first,
the POVRay
police will be visiting you soon. :-p
Kyle
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kyle <hob### [at] gatenet> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:34:45 EST, "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>
> >
> >Is everyone who comes here supposed to post a RSOCP image?
> >
>
> Yes, it's mandatory. Now that you've posted a message without posting a
> RSOCP first, the POVRay police will be visiting you soon. :-p
[...]
Uh oh... you mean, like this?
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'funny.png' (152 KB)
Preview of image 'funny.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> schreef in bericht
news:web.45c82f765fd2b3cfdd5364bf0@news.povray.org...
>
> Uh oh... you mean, like this?
>
You may go free.
If you had not shown us this image........
Thomas
PS nice work by the way :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
> Kyle <hob### [at] gatenet> wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 19:34:45 EST, "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Is everyone who comes here supposed to post a RSOCP image?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, it's mandatory. Now that you've posted a message without posting a
> > RSOCP first, the POVRay police will be visiting you soon. :-p
> [...]
>
> Uh oh... you mean, like this?
Very funny :-)
Although I believe that you get a pardon if your first post was an
animation. (As mine was)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> Oops, now I went ahead and posted something here without posting
> the supposedly mandatory RSOCP image first. So here we go:
Nice one. Wallpaper standard.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 02:34:14 EST, "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>Uh oh... you mean, like this?
Yes. Very funny, and very impressive to put it together so quickly!
Kyle
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kyle <hob### [at] gatenet> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 02:34:14 EST, "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>
> >Uh oh... you mean, like this?
>
> Yes. Very funny, and very impressive to put it together so quickly!
[...]
Hehe, thanks. I already had the model of the alien creature, even
though it's still under development (as you can see, the hands and
feet need a lot more work, and there is still much work to be done
to make the neck flexible, etc., etc.). So it's just copy-n-paste.
The UFO models had also been done previously, ready to be
#include'd, in fact, so it wasn't that much work putting them
into the scene.
So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
cops and getting the UV-mapping of the RSOCP label positioned
properly (this is my first time using UV-mapping in POV). That
is to say, it wasn't *that* much work.
The alien creature, BTW, is a reference to my first post in
p.b.images --- the RSOCP cops are after him 'cos he dared to
land in POVland without first being heralded by an RSOCP
scene. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Nice one. Wallpaper standard.
Heh, thx, guess what's on my desktop since yesterday ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 20:32:59 +0100, Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>
>> Nice one. Wallpaper standard.
>
>Heh, thx, guess what's on my desktop since yesterday ;)
Pizza? :-)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Had to try another RSOCP. Hope this is not addictive.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'pyramid-800.jpg' (50 KB)
Preview of image 'pyramid-800.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> Had to try another RSOCP. Hope this is not addictive.
Nice, but don’t go using up all the good RSOCP, ideas :-)
The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
I think it is *motion* blur! :)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> > The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
>
> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>
> --
> Jaime
My eyes are not at their best in the morning. And it looks like my work’s
monitor needs some time to warm up :-(
I can still see focal blur at the first two or three rows but it is subtle
and pleasing
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
> cops
Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
>>
>> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>>
>>--
>>Jaime
>
>
> My eyes are not at their best in the morning. And it looks like my work’s
> monitor needs some time to warm up :-(
> I can still see focal blur at the first two or three rows but it is subtle
> and pleasing
>
>
> Stephen
>
>
And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
shouldn't be standing in the first place.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:07:40 -0500, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:
>And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
>scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
>shouldn't be standing in the first place.
CAIYF - Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Is Your Friend
Or it needs a monkey, as in freeze the balls off a brass one.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
>> cops
>
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
>
Hmm.... smart :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bill Pragnell wrote:
>
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
>
Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
> news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> > "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
> >> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
> >> cops
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Hmm.... smart :-)
[...]
Hey, that's a good acronym. After all, the cops *are* RS's (reflective
spheres). :-) Maybe I should publish the model I used in the scene.
For, er, reference purposes. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).
[...]
Yes, that is part of the joke, since the scene itself is actually an
RSOCP scene (well, with the definition stretched a little).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
> scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
> shouldn't be standing in the first place.
Ah, but all it took was to reduce gravity to a reasonable level ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?
As I don't know what it is, I'm pretty sure I've posted without submitting
one.
Thanks
-tom
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>
>> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>
> Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
> But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
millican wrote:
> I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
> like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?
Reflective Sphere On a Checkered Plane.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
