POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Yet another RSOCP Server Time
3 Aug 2024 04:15:10 EDT (-0400)
  Yet another RSOCP (Message 17 to 26 of 26)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 7 Feb 2007 13:47:52
Message: <45ca1ed8$1@news.povray.org>
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:

>   I think it is *motion* blur! :)

Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.


Post a reply to this message

From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 7 Feb 2007 15:07:41
Message: <45ca318d$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
> 
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
>>
>>   I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>>
>>--
>>Jaime
> 
> 

> monitor needs some time to warm up :-(
> I can still see focal blur at the first two or three rows but it is subtle
> and pleasing
> 
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the 
scene.  Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down 
shouldn't be standing in the first place.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 7 Feb 2007 15:24:51
Message: <2cdks21aj95f7cjal9p2k6pr42jcqpqsak@4ax.com>
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:07:40 -0500, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote:

>And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the 
>scene.  Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down 
>shouldn't be standing in the first place.

CAIYF - Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Is Your Friend
Or it needs a monkey, as in freeze the balls off a brass one.

Regards
	Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Feb 2007 03:01:19
Message: <45cad8cf$1@news.povray.org>
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht 
news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
>> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
>> cops
>
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
>

Hmm.... smart   :-)

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Feb 2007 10:19:46
Message: <45cb3f92$1@news.povray.org>
Bill Pragnell wrote:
> 
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> 

Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

From: quickfur
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Feb 2007 11:40:00
Message: <web.45cb52475fd2b3cfdd5364bf0@news.povray.org>
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in bericht
> news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> > "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfurathcx> wrote:
> >> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
> >> cops
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Hmm.... smart   :-)
[...]

Hey, that's a good acronym. After all, the cops *are* RS's (reflective
spheres). :-) Maybe I should publish the model I used in the scene.
For, er, reference purposes. :-P


Post a reply to this message

From: quickfur
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Feb 2007 13:55:01
Message: <web.45cb71c85fd2b3cfdd5364bf0@news.povray.org>
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).
[...]

Yes, that is part of the joke, since the scene itself is actually an
RSOCP scene (well, with the definition stretched a little).


Post a reply to this message

From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Feb 2007 14:00:39
Message: <45cb7357@news.povray.org>
Jim Charter wrote:

> And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the 
> scene.  Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down 
> shouldn't be standing in the first place.

Ah, but all it took was to reduce gravity to a reasonable level ;)


Post a reply to this message

From: millican
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Mar 2007 13:21:54
Message: <45f05442@news.povray.org>
I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?
As I don't know what it is, I'm pretty sure I've posted without submitting
one.
Thanks

-tom


Christian Froeschlin wrote:

> Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> 
>>   I think it is *motion* blur! :)
> 
> Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
> But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.


Post a reply to this message

From: Eero Ahonen
Subject: Re: Yet another RSOCP
Date: 8 Mar 2007 15:08:39
Message: <45f06d47$1@news.povray.org>
millican wrote:
> I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
> like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?

Reflective Sphere On a Checkered Plane.

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
   http://www.zbxt.net
      aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.