![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Stephen wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
>
>>Stephen wrote:
>>
>>>The focal blur is a bit strong for my tastes.
>>
>> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>>
>>--
>>Jaime
>
>
> monitor needs some time to warm up :-(
> I can still see focal blur at the first two or three rows but it is subtle
> and pleasing
>
>
> Stephen
>
>
And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
shouldn't be standing in the first place.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:07:40 -0500, Jim Charter <jrc### [at] msn com> wrote:
>And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
>scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
>shouldn't be standing in the first place.
CAIYF - Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Is Your Friend
Or it needs a monkey, as in freeze the balls off a brass one.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> schreef in bericht
news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfur ath cx> wrote:
>> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
>> cops
>
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
>
Hmm.... smart :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Bill Pragnell wrote:
>
> Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
>
Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
> "Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> schreef in bericht
> news:web.45c9d8975fd2b3cf731f01d10@news.povray.org...
> > "quickfur" <qui### [at] quickfur ath cx> wrote:
> >> So most of the real work was creating the claws of the RSOCP
> >> cops
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Hmm.... smart :-)
[...]
Hey, that's a good acronym. After all, the cops *are* RS's (reflective
spheres). :-) Maybe I should publish the model I used in the scene.
For, er, reference purposes. :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid> wrote:
> Bill Pragnell wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. RSOCP cop == RSCop ?
> >
>
> Yes, those cops clearly are reflective spheres ;).
[...]
Yes, that is part of the joke, since the scene itself is actually an
RSOCP scene (well, with the definition stretched a little).
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Charter wrote:
> And the focal blur / motion blur subtlety isn't the only fakeout in the
> scene. Seems to me that the pile that is about to be knocked down
> shouldn't be standing in the first place.
Ah, but all it took was to reduce gravity to a reasonable level ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?
As I don't know what it is, I'm pretty sure I've posted without submitting
one.
Thanks
-tom
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>
>> I think it is *motion* blur! :)
>
> Yes, the final moment before the scene collapses into chaos.
> But as Stephen already noted, there is also a bit of focal blur.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
millican wrote:
> I've been busy with work and haven't been checking this as much as I would
> like. I have one question: What is RSOCP?
Reflective Sphere On a Checkered Plane.
--
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
http://www.zbxt.net
aer### [at] removethis zbxt net invalid
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |