|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's what I've come up with so far. Needs a lot of texturing and all
still. The basic idea is a cargo hold up front, fuel tanks and solar
panels surrounding a central living area, and some engines in the back.
The cargo acts as impact shielding, the hydrogen acts as
radiation shielding, and the engines make it go. A lot of it is
parameratized, so it's tweakable. Here's one configuration
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And another
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Here's what I've come up with so far. Needs a lot of texturing and all
> still. The basic idea is a cargo hold up front, fuel tanks and solar
> panels surrounding a central living area, and some engines in the back.
> The cargo acts as impact shielding, the hydrogen acts as
> radiation shielding, and the engines make it go. A lot of it is
> parameratized, so it's tweakable. Here's one configuration
Errr. Oops
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ship_back_1.jpg' (40 KB)
Preview of image 'ship_back_1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> And another
More oops...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ship_front.jpg' (44 KB)
Preview of image 'ship_front.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.4582cda3ff75702cbc81efaa0@news.povray.org...
> "o.bb.spammed" <o.b### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> And another
>
> More oops...
Oh, yeah, this is good!
Jon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice. With Jupiter or Saturn in the background, this would be really
cool.
Jon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jon S. Berndt nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 15-12-2006 06:48:
> "Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
> news:45828032@news.povray.org...
>> Jon S. Berndt nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 14-12-2006 22:07:
>>> "Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcastnet> wrote
>>> Hey, I kind of like this (I think I've seen something like this in my
>>> kitchen, too!)
>>> A couple of notes:
>>> 1) There should be no over-expansion of the nozzle, I think. All of the
>>> flow would be almost all directed aft.
>> The over-expansion is unavoidable. All you can do, is try to minimise it.
>>> 2) I'm sure this is a WIP, but thought I'd mention that there would be
>>> more to the engine (a lot of equipment creating magnetic fields - coils
>>> and stuff, supply lines for fuel, etc.)
>> Depending on the scale, that can be all contained within the nozle.
> Visually, what I would like to see is probably best illustrated by looking
> at a Hall thruster:
> http://fluid.ippt.gov.pl/sbarral/hall.html
> (see Pratt and Whitney thruster at bottom of this page)
> http://www.engin.umich.edu/dept/aero/spacelab/thrusters/thrusters.html
> http://www.adastrarocket.com/Plasma.html
> There is little, if any, overexpansion of exhaust in these images. The image
> by Tek was very good in this respect.
> Jon
Plasma or ion engines, indeed, don't show overexpansion. The reason is that the
plasma have very neglegible pressure. It don't have presure as it's not
accelerated by the presure but by magnetic and electric fields. I was thinking
more about chemical or nuclear powered rocket engines. In those cases, the
exaust have a prety high residual presure as it leave the engine, and that
residual presure is what causes the overexpansion.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
When the bosses talk about improving productivity, they are never talking about
themselves.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message news:45833d66
> Plasma or ion engines, indeed, don't show overexpansion. The reason is
> that the plasma have very neglegible pressure. It don't have presure as
> it's not accelerated by the presure but by magnetic and electric fields. I
> was thinking more about chemical or nuclear powered rocket engines.
Egg-zactly. :^)
> In those cases, the exaust have a prety high residual presure as it leave
> the engine, and that residual presure is what causes the overexpansion.
>
> Alain
Ideally, rocket nozzles are designed so that the flow is optimally expanded
over the altitude range (pressure range) it operates in. You can't "have it
all".
Jon
--
Jon S. Berndt
Aerospace Engineer
Houston, TX
--
Editor, Horizons, AIAA Houston
http://www.aiaa-houston.org/horizons
--
Project Development Coordinator, JSBSim
http://www.jsbsim.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I'm looking for a cover image for the fall/winter issue of Horizons, the
> online magazine for the Houston section of AIAA (American Institute of
> Aeronautics and Astronautics). See www.aiaa-houston.org/horizons. I'm the
> volunteer editor for that publication. This issue features one or two
> articles on futuristic propulsion concepts. I'm looking for an image of a
> special, realistic, futuristic interstellar or intra-solar system
> spacecraft, that illustrates powerful propulsion as part of its design. As a
> long time user of POV-Ray, I figured this would be a good place to ask
> around. If you have such an image and would be willing to let us use it in
> exchange only for image credit and acknowledgement, I'd like to hear from
> you.
>
> "Horizons" has won first place nationally two years in a row, recognized for
> excellence in production and content. Circulation (downloads) average about
> 5000 per issue (sometimes as high as 20,000 per issue). It is read with
> interest in and around Johnson Space Center near Houston, Texas.
>
> Also, if you are aware of any galleries of renderings (or paintings) of
> futuristic spacecraft, I'd appreciate hearing about those, too.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jon
> Editor, Horizons
> AIAA Houston
> www.aiaa-houston.org/horizons
>
>
>
I am surprised that no one posted this link
http://www.bisbos.com/rocketscience/spacecraft/daedalus/image_general1.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Ideally, rocket nozzles are designed so that the flow is optimally
> expanded over the altitude range (pressure range) it operates in. You
> can't "have it all".
>
> Jon
> --
> Jon S. Berndt
> Aerospace Engineer
> Houston, TX
If I remember correctly the engine bells of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd stages of
the Saturn V were quite different shapes to accomodate this.
This is one of the advantages of the aerospike type of engine... It
effectively uses the atmosphere as the outer wall of the expansion chamber,
thus it automatically adjusts to external atmospheric pressure. What a
great pity the X33 and Venturestar programs were shelved!
Assuming the spacecraft didn't need to enter atmosphere, i.e. it was an
interplanetary craft, its engines would only need to operate in a vacuum, so
no adjustment would be required.
Rarius
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|