|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kenneth wrote:
> Samuel Benge <stb### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone. Here's a banner I made for my girlfriend.
<snip>
>
> Looks nice, but it's difficult to see any 3D depth to the heightfields. Can
> you post another image with the camera in a different position? Maybe
> 45-deg. up? Or nearly edge-on?
>
OK, here's one taken from the top-left side of the height_fields. I had
to stretch them out to render this view, so that you could see the
topology better. They were originally 1 unit x 1 unit, rendered with an
orthographic camera, and the image's width and height were exactly the
same as the input for the height_fields.
This one was not rendered to match the input image's dimensions, so
there are strange lines showing on the lit portions of the HFs.
The strange black regions you see on the backs of the HFs were made from
a strong, planar surface normal I used to obscure the spot where the HFs
were clipped by the water_level 0.n keyword.
Well, that's about it. They don't look so good from this view, because
they were meant to be rendered at 800x244 pixels.
~Sam
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'blackstemz6_29.jpg' (64 KB)
Preview of image 'blackstemz6_29.jpg'
![blackstemz6_29.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C450743b0%40news.povray.org%3E/blackstemz6_29.jpg?ttop=443866&toff=4250&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |