 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi all
Just something I've been playing with recently. It's a ring that I'm
going to make for someone in 18ct yellow and rose gold with 3 diamonds and 2
emeralds. When I've made it, I'll post an image <somewhere> of the real
thing if you're interested.
Yes, there's that kitchen again! ;)
C/C always welcome.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'TOL_ring_1.jpg' (62 KB)
Download 'TOL_ring_2.jpg' (72 KB)
Download 'TOL_ring_3.jpg' (82 KB)
Preview of image 'TOL_ring_1.jpg'
Preview of image 'TOL_ring_2.jpg'
Preview of image 'TOL_ring_3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You're going to *make* it??
Jesus... you must have _really_ small fingers! ;-)
Neat image by the way.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v2" <voi### [at] dev null> wrote in message
news:44b29a6f$1@news.povray.org...
> You're going to *make* it??
Yes, it's her design. She sent me a flat 2D image of what she wanted and
this is the result in Wings3D and PoVRay.
>
> Jesus... you must have _really_ small fingers! ;-)
No, really *BIG* fingers actually. I once had a lady ask me how I do my
job because of the size of my hands, (I'm an Oblivion Ogre!) I guess it's
no different from small fingers. It's all in the grip.
> Neat image by the way.
Hey, thanks Mr. A. :)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Most beautiful, how much would the end product cost ?
Additionally it must take a while to craft aswell.
Good work.
Matt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Since you've got it done digitally already, it seems like a perhaps
less-craftmanlike yet still kinda cool thing to try would be to use one of
those jewelry 3D printers.... Nice images :)
Charles
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> "Orchid XP v2" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
> news:44b29a6f$1@news.povray.org...
> > You're going to *make* it??
>
> Yes, it's her design. She sent me a flat 2D image of what she wanted and
> this is the result in Wings3D and PoVRay.
>
> >
> > Jesus... you must have _really_ small fingers! ;-)
>
> No, really *BIG* fingers actually. I once had a lady ask me how I do my
> job because of the size of my hands, (I'm an Oblivion Ogre!) I guess it's
> no different from small fingers. It's all in the grip.
>
>
>
> > Neat image by the way.
>
> Hey, thanks Mr. A. :)
>
> ~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Charles C" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.44b484ff6b60007d200a56120@news.povray.org...
> Since you've got it done digitally already, it seems like a perhaps
> less-craftmanlike yet still kinda cool thing to try would be to use one of
> those jewelry 3D printers....
Oh, I've been looking at them recently! Yes, I'd love to have a go on one
of those. Now, where to get that kind of money... ;)
Nice images :)
Thank you Charles! :o)
~Steve~
>
> Charles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"barmy_matt" <bar### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.44b4408b6b60007da0a549ad0@news.povray.org...
> Most beautiful, how much would the end product cost ?
Somewhere around £450.
> Additionally it must take a while to craft aswell.
This will probably take about 2-3 weeks to make, in amongst other jobs.
>
> Good work.
Thank you. :o)
~Steve~
>
> Matt
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:44b48f4b@news.povray.org...
> "Charles C" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
> > Since you've got it done digitally already, it seems like a perhaps
> > less-craftmanlike yet still kinda cool thing to try would be to use one
of
> > those jewelry 3D printers....
> Oh, I've been looking at them recently! Yes, I'd love to have a go on one
> of those. Now, where to get that kind of money... ;)
There are lots of service bureaus, which charge around $50-70 per wax/resin
model.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> a écrit dans le message de
news:44d0efe4@news.povray.org...
> Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
>
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
>
http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
>
My Precious!
Beautiful!
The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
BTW when will you make the saxophone?
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
news:44d0f2e8@news.povray.org...
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> a écrit dans le message de
> news:44d0efe4@news.povray.org...
>> Here's the real thing: http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_1.jpg
>>
> http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_2.jpg
>>
> http://website.lineone.net/~25ct/jenni_3.jpg
>>
> My Precious!
> Beautiful!
Thank you Marc.
> The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it right
in PoV ... ;)
>
> BTW when will you make the saxophone?
Heh... Oh, I wish...! :o)
(I'd love to see where they make them, and what they do to make them).
~Steve~
>
> Marc
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neato...
I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Orchid XP v2" <voi### [at] devnull> a écrit dans le message de
news:44d10ec6@news.povray.org...
> Neato...
>
> I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
I agree
> OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
Indeed but you'd have to have a virtual finger to wear it ;-)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>Neato...
>>
>>I think the real thing is more pleasing to the eye than the simulation.
>
> I agree
>
>>OTOH, the sim isn't that bad either... ;-)
>
> Indeed but you'd have to have a virtual finger to wear it ;-)
No problem - I'll give it to my virtual girlfriend. :-$ (It would look
silly on my anyway...)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's nice, Steve. Do you find there is any interplay between the act
of modelling the decorations in mesh and modelling them in real life?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:44d634da$1@news.povray.org...
> That's nice, Steve. Do you find there is any interplay between the act of
> modelling the decorations in mesh and modelling them in real life?
Thanks Jim. Well, for me, no. I'm one of those designers that can
visualise a design, and then go ahead and make what I 'see' in my head. By
this, I mean that I very rarely draw a design, and then make it. Sad really,
as I was (hopefully!) a good line/shade artist with pencil/charcoal, etc.
when I was younger - I just don't do it now, (even for pleasure, where at
one stage, that was all I did), but since I bought one of these damn
comp's... ;) all I do now, is play with 3D. It's strange really, as I
never envisaged owning a computer - ever. Now I have one, (my first one),
that's sat beside me on the floor doing nothing, and a new monster black
tower thingy humming away in front of me. So I own two. And, you know, it's
really not 'me', but I love the challenge of a computer, and I think you
know where I'm coming from with this.
I digress. As for your original question Jim, making a 3D image just cant
compare with making the 'real thing'. There're too many physical procedures
to go through to complete a ring, (item), and then be satisfied with the
result/s compared to the 3D image.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 02/08/2006 14:58:
> "Marc" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message
> news:44d0f2e8@news.povray.org...
>>
>
> Thank you Marc.
>
>
>> The green gems (emerald?) are greener than on the renders
>
> But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it right
> in PoV ... ;)
First, find the best possible colour and apply it as fade_color to the interior,
not the surface.
Then...
Try changing fade_distance to a smaller value until it's OK. Also, having the
right ior and dispersion helps.
>
>
>
>> Marc
>>
>>
>
>
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe that ex-lovers are
really dying for you to telephone them at four in the morning.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:44d7d6e4$1@news.povray.org...
]
>> But that's because they're real emeralds... If only I can get it
>> right in PoV ... ;)
> First, find the best possible colour and apply it as fade_color to the
> interior, not the surface.
> Then...
> Try changing fade_distance to a smaller value until it's OK. Also, having
> the right ior and dispersion helps.
Thanks Alain, I'll give that a try now that I'm near finishing my IRTC
image.
~Steve~
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
> WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may lead you to believe that ex-lovers
> are really dying for you to telephone them at four in the morning.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
