Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Any guesses what's going on with this?>> Is this a coincident surface problem or something? Or does CSG merge> always work this way?
Lookslike coincident surface is likely. Just difference a plane to clip the
front and back of the letters.
-tgq
Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Any guesses what's going on with this?>> Is this a coincident surface problem or something? Or does CSG merge> always work this way?
I wrote a little macro that randomly translate an object to prevent
coincident problems. It only moves the object by +-.0001 but that does the
trick. Once you write the macro just put it in every object being used.
From: Gail Shaw
Subject: Re: Wait, what the hell...?
Date: 18 May 2006 16:01:16
Message: <446cd28c@news.povray.org>
"Orchid XP v2" <voi### [at] devnull> wrote in message
news:446c5562@news.povray.org...
> Any guesses what's going on with this?>> Is this a coincident surface problem or something? Or does CSG merge> always work this way?>
bit of both. Merge means union and remove all internal surfaces. You've got
2 surfaces coincident, so the merge thought they were both internal and
removed both. Just offset one by a little. +-0.0001 works fine.
null> wrote: