From: JC (Exether)
Subject: Re: Placing random spheres (~330k in attachments)
Date: 25 May 2006 07:45:57
Message: <447598f5$1@news.povray.org>
Ah, OK, mine just does it. :-)
When talking about efficiency, I think that external programming (C++,
Java ...) will be much faster.
Warp wrote:
> JC (Exether) wrote:> >> I did a macro package some time ago that does that in various >> configurations:> > > Does what?> My point was not how to do it, but how to do it *fast*.
--
http://sibylone.free.fr
From: Warp
Subject: Re: Placing random spheres (~330k in attachments)
Date: 26 May 2006 09:03:51
Message: <4476fcb7@news.povray.org>
JC (Exether) wrote:
> When talking about efficiency, I think that external programming (C++, > Java ...) will be much faster.
With less than 70 lines of code? I don't think so.
