 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here: I have started to add neccessary details such as superstructures to
the side bays, still some more to come!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'SpaceCarrier.jpg' (225 KB)
Preview of image 'SpaceCarrier.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 30/04/2006 07:10:
>
There is a significative difference between the HTML post with embeded image and text
with attached
image. HTML: 319 K, text: 324K.
Both shows up correctly here.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Maybe God wants us to meet a few wrong people
before meeting the right one, so that when
we finally meet the person, we will know how to be
grateful.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 30/04/2006 16:55:
>
> getting your good feedback is my pride! You want to know the SENECA's
> length: the two large bays are the longest parts of the carrier, and they
> range from approximately -200 to +1800. Each unit is a meter, as I am used
> for the metric system. That means, that the SENECA is (a little bit more
> than) 2 KM long!
>
> The SENECA is a project for a SF computer animation, in fact, there is
> already a small clip of 10 seconds. But the ship is not yet completed, I
> just like to spice up the temporary previews with a nice environment. More
> details are to be added to the SENECA, and I also still have to finish many
> of the floors inside that giant ship. The floors do exist, but lack items
> and other things.
>
> About the backgrounds: no these backgrounds are made just by graphic program
> or photo. But there are ways to make a POV-Ray universe (search for
> "stars.inc").
>
> Alright, I hope to hear from you (all) again!
>
> Sven
>
>
>
star.inc don't like AA! You may need to multiply the color_map values by some large
values. How
large depending on the method used and the recursion level.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Alain,
in some of my previews I used the "stars.inc" file which I like a lot! I
have not encountered the problems with AA as you mention. Those files were
generated with switched on AA.
However, I appreciate your note and hope to get many more informations and
feedback from you.
Greetings,
Sven
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscape net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:4456a0e6$1@news.povray.org...
> Sven Littkowski nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 30/04/2006 16:55:
>>
>> getting your good feedback is my pride! You want to know the SENECA's
>> length: the two large bays are the longest parts of the carrier, and they
>> range from approximately -200 to +1800. Each unit is a meter, as I am
>> used for the metric system. That means, that the SENECA is (a little bit
>> more than) 2 KM long!
>>
>> The SENECA is a project for a SF computer animation, in fact, there is
>> already a small clip of 10 seconds. But the ship is not yet completed, I
>> just like to spice up the temporary previews with a nice environment.
>> More details are to be added to the SENECA, and I also still have to
>> finish many of the floors inside that giant ship. The floors do exist,
>> but lack items and other things.
>>
>> About the backgrounds: no these backgrounds are made just by graphic
>> program or photo. But there are ways to make a POV-Ray universe (search
>> for "stars.inc").
>>
>> Alright, I hope to hear from you (all) again!
>>
>> Sven
>>
>>
>>
> star.inc don't like AA! You may need to multiply the color_map values by
> some large values. How large depending on the method used and the
> recursion level.
>
> --
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
> CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Scene:
The mega preview showing the current stage of the imperial carrier
SENECA.
The interior of the two large bays comes soon to its completion, and I
will
continue then to work on the outside details of the bays and the middle
section.
PS: The "Preview 10 (1.0 MB): Imperial Carrier" contains a larger image
of the SENECA (6400x4800 pixels) and the render statistics.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'iso-8859-1' (1 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
System/Software:
Dual Intel Pentium 4 3.06 GH CPU
1.25 GB RAM
Windows XP Media Edition
POV-Ray 3.7.0 Beta 12a
Statistics:
File Sze 6400x4800 pixels, true color
File Format JPEG RGB
CPU time used: kernel 1.61 seconds, user 105.64 seconds, total 107.25
seconds.
Elapsed time 118.45 seconds.
Render averaged 8.57 PPS (9.46 PPS CPU time) over 1015 pixels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parser Statistics
Finite Objects: 5550
Infinite Objects: 1
Light Sources: 3
Total: 5554
Parser Time
Parse Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.000 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 52.671 CPU-seconds total
Bounding Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 0 seconds (0.031 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 0.031 CPU-seconds total
Render Options
Quality: 9
Bounding boxes.......On Bounding threshold: 3
Antialiasing.........On (Method 1, Threshold 0.300, Depth 3, Jitter 1.00)
Render Statistics
Image Resolution 6400 x 4800
Pixels: 32640624 Samples: 5630760 Smpls/Pxl: 0.17
Rays: 38348708 Saved: 2448 Max Level: 4/5
Ray->Shape Intersection Tests Succeeded Percentage
Blob 115032246 26819919 23.32
Blob Component 309186348 149996941 48.51
Blob Bound 1263903690 309186348 24.46
Box 4359046387 268788008 6.17
Cone/Cylinder 25648885221 256481579 1.00
CSG Intersection 1235856708 106116398 8.59
CSG Merge 99103304 10096307 10.19
CSG Union 839761650 103175839 12.29
Sphere 36108231804 82712392 0.23
Torus 17386309 4816136 27.70
Torus Bound 17386309 6217647 35.76
Bounding Box 2795975941 838697951 30.00
Roots tested: 66258092 eliminated: 636532
Shadow Ray Tests: 24679934 Succeeded: 17444942
Shadow Cache Hits: 17424493
Reflected Rays: 10148
Transmitted Rays: 17983
Smallest Alloc: 9 bytes
Largest Alloc: 44408 bytes
Peak memory used: 141014630 bytes
Render Time:
Photon Time: No photons
Radiosity Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 38 seconds (38.562 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 32.781 CPU-seconds total
Trace Time: 21 hours 23 minutes 5 seconds (76985.141 seconds)
using 1 thread(s) with 70967.859 CPU-seconds total
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sven Littkowski
Subject: Preview 10 (1.0 MB, 6400x4800px): Imperial Carrier
Date: 1 May 2006 22:19:03
Message: <4456c197@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The attached image had to reduced dramatically in its data amount and image
size. On
request, I can e-mail you a high-quality JPEG in the size of 6400x4800
pixels..
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'SpaceCarrier1MB.jpg' (670 KB)
Preview of image 'SpaceCarrier1MB.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sven Littkowski wrote:
> System/Software:
> Dual Intel Pentium 4 3.06 GH CPU
> 1.25 GB RAM
> Windows XP Media Edition
> POV-Ray 3.7.0 Beta 12a
> Render Time:
> Photon Time: No photons
> Radiosity Time: 0 hours 0 minutes 38 seconds (38.562 seconds)
> using 1 thread(s) with 32.781 CPU-seconds total
> Trace Time: 21 hours 23 minutes 5 seconds (76985.141 seconds)
> using 1 thread(s) with 70967.859 CPU-seconds total
Just out of curiosity, why are you using only one thread on a dual CPU
system? Is it just so you can keep using your computer in the meantime?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Larry Hudson <org### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>
> *snip*
>
> PS. To Roman:
>
> It might be worthwhile for you to consider using a real newsreader
> instead of the web interface with a browser. I think Thunderbird is a
> good choice, and it's free -- but there are many other good choices as
> well. (Of course, Thunderbird is primarily meant for e-mail, but it
> does newsgroups very well also.)
I'm actually using Thunderbird already but only for emails. I weren't aware
of its newsreader abilities. I'll try this now!
To sven:
Since you attach your images i can see them with the web browser without any
problems and your model is great!
Keep it up!
Regards Roman
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
To Roman:
My pleasure! The fault was on my side - I should have done it from the very
first moment that way (attaching). Sorry again for the temporary
inconvenience.
Greetings,
Sven
> To sven:
> Since you attach your images i can see them with the web browser without
> any
> problems and your model is great!
> Keep it up!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
