POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Is this it? Server Time
8 Aug 2024 12:24:57 EDT (-0400)
  Is this it? (Message 1 to 10 of 12)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>
From: St 
Subject: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 16:29:30
Message: <42deb42a@news.povray.org>
Am I there now??

  ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'rb.jpg' (28 KB)

Preview of image 'rb.jpg'
rb.jpg


 

From: JWV
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 16:56:37
Message: <42deba85$1@news.povray.org>
it made me laugh, so when you are trying to acchieve that, you can say this
is it :-)

But to win the IRTC, it may need a bit of tweaking on lights and
surroundings

JWV



"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:42deb42a@news.povray.org...
> Am I there now??
>
>   ~Steve~
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 17:21:04
Message: <42dec040@news.povray.org>
"JWV" <jwv|at|planet.nl> wrote in message news:42deba85$1@news.povray.org...
> it made me laugh,

   Thanks JWV! I like to make people laugh, so I've achieved *something* at 
least!  :)



so when you are trying to acchieve that, you can say this
> is it :-)

   Hehe...  I think I will.  :)



>
> But to win the IRTC, it may need a bit of tweaking on lights and
> surroundings

   EEEK! The word "win" was used! What's that??   ;)

     Thanks again.

      ~Steve~


>
> JWV
>
>
>
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote in message news:42deb42a@news.povray.org...
>> Am I there now??
>>
>>   ~Steve~
>>
>>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Alex
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 17:21:44
Message: <GaK6FEQd9r3CFwb3@lazysod.org.uk>
In message <42deb42a@news.povray.org>, St. <dot### [at] dotcom> writes
>Am I there now??
>
Nice image, but with that loop in the elastic band there needs to be a 
twist to go with it. Or if you add a second loop correctly, you can do 
without the twist.
-- 
Alex


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 17:30:23
Message: <42dec26f@news.povray.org>
"Alex" <pov### [at] lazysodorguk> wrote in message 
news:GaK### [at] lazysodorguk...
> In message <42deb42a@news.povray.org>, St. <dot### [at] dotcom> writes
>>Am I there now??
>>
> Nice image, but with that loop in the elastic band there needs to be a 
> twist to go with it. Or if you add a second loop correctly, you can do 
> without the twist.

    GRRR... You spotted it! :)  Would you believe I copied an elastic band 
from my desk that looked like what you're explaining but I didn't bother 
with the second loop? Yes, I guess so...  ;)

    Ok, a second loop coming up.  ;)

      Thank you Alex.

        ~Steve~


> -- 
> Alex


Post a reply to this message

From: andrel
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 18:47:07
Message: <42DED3D7.9030804@hotmail.com>
St. wrote:
> 
> "Alex" <pov### [at] lazysodorguk> wrote in message 
> news:GaK### [at] lazysodorguk...
> 
>> In message <42deb42a@news.povray.org>, St. <dot### [at] dotcom> writes
>>
>>> Am I there now??
>>>
>> Nice image, but with that loop in the elastic band there needs to be a 
>> twist to go with it. Or if you add a second loop correctly, you can do 
>> without the twist.
> 
> 
>    GRRR... You spotted it! :)  Would you believe I copied an elastic 
> band from my desk that looked like what you're explaining but I didn't 
> bother with the second loop? Yes, I guess so...  ;)
> 
>    Ok, a second loop coming up.  ;)
I like it this way. It is an image of a rubberband with a twist
(pun intended). I actually thought it was intended.


Post a reply to this message

From: Shay
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 21:26:50
Message: <42def9da$1@news.povray.org>
St. wrote:
> Am I there now??
> 

There where? "There" to what's likely to win the round ( A single-object 
study with rad )? Yes. Still, not really minimalist in any way in which 
I can imagine defining it. Looks like one of Tor's geometry posts with a 
lot *added* to it.

  -Shay


Post a reply to this message

From: dlm
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 20 Jul 2005 23:12:08
Message: <42df1288$1@news.povray.org>
"Shay" <dd### [at] dddd> wrote in message news:42def9da$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> Am I there now??
>>
>
> There where? "There" to what's likely to win the round ( A single-object 
> study with rad )? Yes. Still, not really minimalist in any way in which I 
> can imagine defining it. Looks like one of Tor's geometry posts with a lot 
> *added* to it.
>
>  -Shay


Well, half a twist would be a minimalist Moebius.
DLM


Post a reply to this message

From: Sebastian H 
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 21 Jul 2005 03:41:45
Message: <42df51b9$1@news.povray.org>
JWV wrote:
> it made me laugh, so when you are trying to acchieve that, you can say this
> is it :-)
> 

Me too.


Post a reply to this message

From: St 
Subject: Re: Is this it?
Date: 21 Jul 2005 15:22:24
Message: <42dff5f0@news.povray.org>
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message 
news:42dfb08a$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
> The reductive spirit is there.  Banal subject, narrow color range, stark 
> setting.
> And you even kept the checkered grid.

     Is a checkered grid important?


> It does seem to have a comic side though, stemming for me anyway, from a 
> tendency to anthropomorphize.  It looks like "he" is ready to jump.

  Ah, "To ascribe human characteristics to" - or similar. Well, sorry Jim, 
but 'he' would be jumping into a wall, (and bounce back?)  ;)  Heh, it's 
actually not clear in this image that the 'blackness' is a wall and finishes 
at the end of those tiles... ;)


> I keep picturing another rubber band on a fire ladder trying to talk him 
> down.  Maybe I am just in a whimsical mood this morning.

     Well, I hope, (and I'm sure), you were in a whimsical mood. We need to 
laugh more in this world.

>
> To be absolutely honest Steve, I thought you first picture was more on 
> topic for minimalism.  It looked more abstract and was suggestive of the
> sort of "big steel" geometric sculpture that characterized the time.

  Thanks Jim, I 'love' that image, but I thought the rivets used were too 
unminimalistic, i.e., too complex to be minimalist. I'll have a play and see 
what happens.


>
> This one seems like it would have more potential if you pushed it towards 
> simulating macro photography like you do with you jewelry pieces.  Another 
> dodge might be to mess with the scale.  Make the grid fine so the rubber 
> band looks gigantic?  Or have a tiny figure looking up at it?

   Or both. Jim, seriously, you help me. Thanks, I sincerely appreciate it. 
(I've played with the gigantic rubber band, and it looks good, but I feel I 
might submit a few images this time - double loop to come though...)  ;)

    ~Steve~


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 2 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.