"Shay" <dd### [at] dddd> wrote in message news:42def9da$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> Am I there now??
>>
>
> There where?

  Trying to do a minimal/ist image. I don't want to do a drawing pin, 
(tack), in a board, I'm trying to do something different, and I'm finding it 
frighteningly hard where I thought it would be easy as sinch... :/


"There" to what's likely to win the round ( A single-object
> study with rad )? Yes. Still, not really minimalist in any way in which I 
> can imagine defining it.

   And there you see, is the frightening aspect of it.


Looks like one of Tor's geometry posts with a
> lot *added* to it.

    Yes, I've got to get rid of the 'lot' I think.

     Thanks Shay.

     ~Steve~


>
>  -Shay

Post a reply to this message

St. wrote:

> 
>  Thanks Jim, I 'love' that image, but I thought the rivets used were too 
> unminimalistic, i.e., too complex to be minimalist. I'll have a play and 
> see what happens.
> 
> 

Remember your own boy, Anthony Caro, he let the rivets show I think.


Anyway my whole point here is that with minimalism redux, we can have 
some fun.  It doesn't have to be as tyrannical as it was the first time 
'round.

Post a reply to this message