|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Hi peeps.
>
> Remember this? (Yeah, it's only a short render.)
>
> Anyway, somebody wanted the code...
>
Andrew, if you are still following this thread. Can I use your code for an
entry into the IRTC?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Andrew, if you are still following this thread. Can I use your code for an
> entry into the IRTC?
Sure - be my guest! ;-)
(Erm... did somebody die and leave you a CRAY?)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:27:19 +0100, Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull>
wrote:
>> Andrew, if you are still following this thread. Can I use your code for an
>> entry into the IRTC?
>
>Sure - be my guest! ;-)
Thanks I'll credit you if you want to be associated :-)
>(Erm... did somebody die and leave you a CRAY?)
No, I used Mike's "pigment function" idea and modified your code to
generate a series of images with different values of "C".
I like the simple way I said "modified your code" I got the animation
OK but when I tried to change it so it rendered the "normal" quadratic
Mandelbrot I got completely lost and could not do it. My lack not
yours.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>>>Andrew, if you are still following this thread. Can I use your code for an
>>>entry into the IRTC?
>>
>>Sure - be my guest! ;-)
>
>
> Thanks I'll credit you if you want to be associated :-)
LOL! Thanks. :-)
>>(Erm... did somebody die and leave you a CRAY?)
>
>
> No, I used Mike's "pigment function" idea and modified your code to
> generate a series of images with different values of "C".
Ah, right. Much faster than an isosurface...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:35:04 +0100, Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull>
wrote:
>> No, I used Mike's "pigment function" idea and modified your code to
>> generate a series of images with different values of "C".
>
>Ah, right. Much faster than an isosurface...
Yes especially since I am creating DF3 files with 240 "frames" times
3. It is taking between 8 and 12 hours as it is. Isosurfaces would
take forever.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |