 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thought you might be interested in this scene...
I used Geomorph (not the last version!) for the landscape, Gilles Tran's
Make Cloud, and Gena's POVtree for the vegetation. The look-out is the
Lioness from the Taschen collection.
As always, comments are welcome.
Enjoy!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'El Barranco_05_the look-out.jpg' (84 KB)
Preview of image 'El Barranco_05_the look-out.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
beautiful !
cu!
--
camera{location-z*3}#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*(C/50)#end#macro L(b,e,k,l)#local C=0
;#while(C<50)sphere{G(b,e),.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1
;#end#end L(y-x,y,x,x+y)L(y,-x-y,x+y,y)L(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)L(-y,y,y+z,x+y)L(0,x+y,
<.5,1,.5>,x)L(0,x-y,<.5,1,.5>,x) // ZK http://www.povplace.be.tf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlnet> a écrit dans le message de
news:4263549c@news.povray.org...
> Thought you might be interested in this scene...
>
Wow beautifull!
These are not the Netherlands are they? I consider seeing neither windmill
nor tulip as a clue ;-)
My 2 cents: trees are too small for a rain forest and too dense for savanna,
maybe it is a transition area?
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> schreef in bericht
news:42635f00@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> a écrit dans le message de
> news:4263549c@news.povray.org...
> > Thought you might be interested in this scene...
> >
> Wow beautifull!
> These are not the Netherlands are they? I consider seeing neither windmill
> nor tulip as a clue ;-)
> My 2 cents: trees are too small for a rain forest and too dense for
savanna,
> maybe it is a transition area?
>
Thank you, Marc!
No, not NL indeed, although.... have you heard about the "Frisian Alps"?
They appear on bottles of Berenburg (nice drink when you are cold,
especially on a ship in winter).
So, what is this landscape? Indeed, a transition. Trees are concentrated in
the valleys, where the water is. But of course, I did not intend any real
landscape. It is the mood I am interested in.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Zeger Knaepen" <zeg### [at] studentkuleuvenacbe> schreef in bericht
news:426357c6@news.povray.org...
> beautiful !
>
Thank you, Zeger!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Romantic
It makes me think about Der Hirt auf dem Felsen of Franz Schubert
Really a "drawing" not simply an image.
rémy closset
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> a écrit dans le message de news:
4263549c@news.povray.org...
> Thought you might be interested in this scene...
>
> I used Geomorph (not the last version!) for the landscape, Gilles Tran's
> Make Cloud, and Gena's POVtree for the vegetation. The look-out is the
> Lioness from the Taschen collection.
>
> As always, comments are welcome.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
in news:4263549c@news.povray.org Thomas de Groot wrote:
> As always, comments are welcome.
>
Thomas,
To what gamma did you render the image? It looks very flat here, the
darkest tone is in the range of rgb 0.2
Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ingo" <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:Xns963CAA07F35Eseed7@news.povray.org...
> in news:4263549c@news.povray.org Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
> > As always, comments are welcome.
> >
>
> Thomas,
>
> To what gamma did you render the image? It looks very flat here, the
> darkest tone is in the range of rgb 0.2
>
> Ingo
Assumed_gamma 1 was used; no radiosity; only one light source.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Remy Closset" <rem### [at] tiscalifr> schreef in bericht
news:4263c4fb$1@news.povray.org...
> Romantic
> It makes me think about Der Hirt auf dem Felsen of Franz Schubert
> Really a "drawing" not simply an image.
>
> rémy closset
Thank you, Rémy! I agree with you. It is probably my deeply rooted romantic
mood :-)
I have been reminded also somewhat of the painter Kaspar Friedrich.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think this is a really good scene, but the left half of it is lit almost
completely by ambient lighting and doesn't look so good in my opinion. With
all those leaves radiosity might be out of the question, but you might
experiment with shadowless lights.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ingo" <ing### [at] tagpovrayorg> schreef in bericht
news:Xns963CAA07F35Eseed7@news.povray.org...
> in news:4263549c@news.povray.org Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
> > As always, comments are welcome.
> >
>
> Thomas,
>
> To what gamma did you render the image? It looks very flat here, the
> darkest tone is in the range of rgb 0.2
>
> Ingo
There is a marked difference between the aspect of the image in the mail
(here it is correctly contrasted) and when viewed (indeed) in PaintShopPro
where it is more washed out. I decreased gamma there to 0.76 and obtained a
satisfying (and similar) tone.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> schreef in bericht
news:4264b858@news.povray.org...
> I think this is a really good scene, but the left half of it is lit almost
> completely by ambient lighting and doesn't look so good in my opinion.
With
> all those leaves radiosity might be out of the question, but you might
> experiment with shadowless lights.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
Thank you indeed.
Now, you point to something very puzzling and I was waiting for somebody to
point this out. The fact is that there is no ambient lighting "used" there,
at the left, and I am wondering where it comes from. Not from the rock
texturing (no finish); I had also a shadowless light, then commented it out
because I had the impression that it made things worse. Could there be some
freak reflection? I suppose not, though...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Got it!!
Being used to Moray, where I always set the ambient_light in the
global_settings to 0 (or a very low value), I forgot that in POV the default
of ambient_light is 1 :-(
No puzzle left! I shall provide a better image!!
Thanks for making me think again!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote in message
news:4264c181@news.povray.org...
> Got it!!
>
> Being used to Moray, where I always set the ambient_light in the
> global_settings to 0 (or a very low value), I forgot that in POV the
default
> of ambient_light is 1 :-(
The default for ambient in Pov is 0.1. Still a little too high for my
liking, I usually put
#default {finish {ambient 0.02}} at the top of every file, but certainly not
that high.
Gail
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> >I forgot that in POV the default
> > of ambient_light is 1 :-(
>
> The default for ambient in Pov is 0.1.
Just to avoid confusion, POV-Ray has two values for ambient light: the first
is the global value, specified in global_settings, that is a multiplier for
all ambient light in the scene. This is 1 by default and you might want to
change it if, say, you wanted the scene to have colored ambient lighting.
The second value is per-object and specified in the finish block. The
default for this one is 0.1.
Although all ambient lighting can be turned off with global_settings
{ambient_light 0}, the best way to do this is with #default{finish{ambient
0}} as this can be overriden for a specific object.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: The look-out - corrected for ambient lighting
Date: 20 Apr 2005 03:00:00
Message: <4265fdf0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I put ambient_light in the general settings to 0.1 in this new scene
version, and added a shadowless light to highlight somewhat the cliff's
shadows. Much better in my opinion.
What do you think?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'El Barranco_05_the look-out.jpg' (93 KB)
Preview of image 'El Barranco_05_the look-out.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> a écrit dans le message de
news:426562ec$1@news.povray.org...
> Although all ambient lighting can be turned off with global_settings
> {ambient_light 0}, the best way to do this is with #default{finish{ambient
> 0}} as this can be overriden for a specific object.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
This is very usefull for radiosity lighting when you want some objects to
emit light and the others not.
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I put ambient_light in the general settings to 0.1 in this new scene
> version, and added a shadowless light to highlight somewhat the cliff's
> shadows. Much better in my opinion.
>
> What do you think?
Definitely a big improvement!
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gail Shaw" <gsh### [at] sentechsacom> schreef in bericht
news:42655444@news.povray.org...
>
> The default for ambient in Pov is 0.1. Still a little too high for my
> liking, I usually put
> #default {finish {ambient 0.02}} at the top of every file, but certainly
not
> that high.
>
> Gail
>
>
Well, thanks for reminding me that the finish ambient default was 0.1. I had
indeed forgotten that too!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
