 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I don't feel that it's a great result, but I have to
> start something new. Hope someone likes it.
I love it !!!
Can you render it in 1440x900 (or in 1024x768) ??
--
Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
Site : http://www.mesnews.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marneus Calgar wrote:
>> I don't feel that it's a great result, but I have to
>> start something new. Hope someone likes it.
>
> I love it !!!
> Can you render it in 1440x900 (or in 1024x768) ??
>
Thanks.
I guess I could try a bigger render, it's currently
960x980 so I could double that for 1920x1960, and
take on board Jerome's antialiasing advice. I still
have the radiosity save file.
It should take about a week, I'll post a link if/when
I've done it.
--
Bill Hails
http://thyme.homelinux.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Marneus Calgar wrote:
>
>>> I don't feel that it's a great result, but I have to
>>> start something new. Hope someone likes it.
>>
>> I love it !!!
>> Can you render it in 1440x900 (or in 1024x768) ??
>>
>
> Thanks.
> I guess I could try a bigger render, it's currently
> 960x980 so I could double that for 1920x1960, and
> take on board Jerome's antialiasing advice. I still
> have the radiosity save file.
> It should take about a week, I'll post a link if/when
> I've done it.
Hmmm, 960x980 is enough, don't waste your CPU time for me !!!!
(but thank you for your proposal)
--
Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
Site : http://www.mesnews.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marneus Calgar wrote:
>> Marneus Calgar wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't feel that it's a great result, but I have to
>>>> start something new. Hope someone likes it.
>>>
>>> I love it !!!
>>> Can you render it in 1440x900 (or in 1024x768) ??
>>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>> I guess I could try a bigger render, it's currently
>> 960x980 so I could double that for 1920x1960, and
>> take on board Jerome's antialiasing advice. I still
>> have the radiosity save file.
>> It should take about a week, I'll post a link if/when
>> I've done it.
>
> Hmmm, 960x980 is enough, don't waste your CPU time for me !!!!
> (but thank you for your proposal)
>
Too late! :-)
it didn't take nearly that long anyway, though there are some
radiosity issues it seems.
Stitched from 3 parallel renders:
==> 0Kotoji.log <==
Total Time: 32 hours 15 minutes 32 seconds (116132 seconds)
==> 1Kotoji.log <==
Total Time: 47 hours 51 minutes 43 seconds (172303 seconds)
==> 2Kotoji.log <==
Total Time: 46 hours 40 minutes 41 seconds (168041 seconds)
http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Kotoji.html
or if that's too slow
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/w.hails/Gallery/Kotoji.html
but that may not be up to date.
(click through the image to get the full size one)
--
Bill Hails
http://thyme.homelinux.net/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thank you !!!
> Too late! :-)
>
> it didn't take nearly that long anyway, though there are some
> radiosity issues it seems.
> Stitched from 3 parallel renders:
>
> ==> 0Kotoji.log <==
> Total Time: 32 hours 15 minutes 32 seconds (116132 seconds)
>
> ==> 1Kotoji.log <==
> Total Time: 47 hours 51 minutes 43 seconds (172303 seconds)
>
> ==> 2Kotoji.log <==
> Total Time: 46 hours 40 minutes 41 seconds (168041 seconds)
>
> http://thyme.homelinux.net/Gallery/Kotoji.html
> or if that's too slow
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/w.hails/Gallery/Kotoji.html
> but that may not be up to date.
> (click through the image to get the full size one)
--
Dark Skull Software
http://www.darkskull.net
A+
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
