 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For real meteorites, they would have a dark color, and be less deeply
pitted.
But, you did say asteroids.. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
so much for the "zazzle 7800x5200" idea then......
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
LightBeam wrote:
> Just playing with isosurface, but really too long to render :-\
> 26h on a XP3200+...
Tony
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eli wrote:
> so much for the "zazzle 7800x5200" idea then......
Let's see, I roughly guess a week for 1600x1200,
and 9 years for the zazzle. The zazzle might be
finished faster by waiting five years for technology
increase, and then letting go with whatever hardware
and POV code is available then.
-Scott
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Eli wrote:
>> so much for the "zazzle 7800x5200" idea then......
>
> Let's see, I roughly guess a week for 1600x1200,
> and 9 years for the zazzle. The zazzle might be
> finished faster by waiting five years for technology
> increase, and then letting go with whatever hardware
> and POV code is available then.
>
> -Scott
If 1600x1200 takes a week, then 7800x5200 should take a bit less than 25
weeks, or 6 months. Where did the 9 years figure come frommm?
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Eli wrote:
>> so much for the "zazzle 7800x5200" idea then......
>
> Let's see, I roughly guess a week for 1600x1200,
> and 9 years for the zazzle. The zazzle might be
> finished faster by waiting five years for technology
> increase, and then letting go with whatever hardware
> and POV code is available then.
>
> -Scott
You're replying to a thread over a year old?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
