> Yeah...area lights plus media are REALLY slow, compared to just using an> array of spot or point lights.
I find that very surprising... what evidence do you have that points to that
conclusion?
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
> Preview render of what's currently on day 8, at line 25 on my other> machine...this one with simpler media settings and only one spotlight.
A very nice and poetic image!
;-)
Paolo
Slime wrote:
> I find that very surprising... what evidence do you have that points to that> conclusion?
um...*runs some test renders with a sphere with media*
array of 3x3 point lights: 31 s
3x3 area light, adaptive 0: 11 s (13 s with jitter)
3x3 area light, adaptive 1: 22 s (24 s with jitter)
3x3 area light, adaptive 2: 23 s (25 s with jitter)
...
hrm. I stand corrected.
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Marc-Hendrik Bremer wrote:
> there is something odd happening with the wings. See the attached file.
Vertical line is cause by shadow cast by no_image no_reflection box used
to shape the spotlight to be like the array of spotlights in the other
image.
--
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------