 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: 412e3a92$1@news.povray.org...
> In boreal forests it can become quiet cold and lonely at some times; At
> least in my impression since I was never in such regions.
>
>
I got that feeling at 1st (and next)sight while looking at you image
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> Yes, hopefully in the next future on the web. But this doesn't only depend
> on me. If you want, I can send it to you directly.
Well, I think it would make an awesome background for anyone who faces
teh corner of a cube all day. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow, ............ i find no words. Phantastic work.
Keep on doing that.
Shu
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> After two weeks rendering on two machines, "Boreal" is finally finished.
> Hope it can be seen now that the camera is near a cliff with a distant hill
> covered with (hardly detectable) trees.
>
> It has been rendered in 2048*1152 pixels and scaled down via photoshop.
> Peak memory was about 1.1 GB.
> I skipped a plane and now the only little red spot in the image is on a
> woodpecker, which can be hardly seen at all.
>
> Hope you like it.
>
>
> Norbert Kern
>
>
>
nice picture, for me, a sense of a steepish valley beyond, not a cliff
though
i know ferns are fractals, but some variation in the
'fronds' ?? near the rocks, maybe yellowing, some tanned, last years maybe
now real problem, where's the woodpecker ?
stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16 demoncouk> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:41303583@news.povray.org...
> i know ferns are fractals, but some variation in the
> 'fronds' ?? near the rocks, maybe yellowing, some tanned, last years maybe
good idea, should have done that.
> now real problem, where's the woodpecker ?
see the image. As I said the woodpecker is hard to see.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'boreal_woodpecker.jpg' (133 KB)
Preview of image 'boreal_woodpecker.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hope you like it.
Yup, I like it. Lots.
Andrew @ home.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Norbert Kern" <nor### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:4130871f@news.povray.org...
>
> "stephen parkinson" <ste### [at] zmemw16demoncouk> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag
> > now real problem, where's the woodpecker ?
>
>
> see the image. As I said the woodpecker is hard to see.
As it should be. Nice Woody.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> I can understand your point.
> Perhaps it's a personal thing, but I like the ultra_wide_angle camera.
> I think it's more natural than the usual Povray camera.
>
Sure, art is always about personal preference...
> By the way, where were you whn you saw such a point?
>
It was in the Alps, southern Germany.
Wolfgang
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Norbert Kern wrote:
> Hope you like it.
I like it very much. The blue haze is somewhat distracting, it's a
little too... blue. Very nice render.
Oskar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gorgeous! Blue sky might be a little too bright.
Love it muchly!
=Bob=
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
