POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : round thing Server Time
11 Aug 2024 09:20:27 EDT (-0400)
  round thing (Message 4 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Roody Aumoithe
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 28 Apr 2004 23:03:40
Message: <4090708c@news.povray.org>
Apache wrote:

> I used focal blur, area_light (2,2) and radiosity. CSG only.
> 
> Total Time:  160 hours 37 minutes  41.0 seconds (578261 seconds)

whoa!
-- 
????


Post a reply to this message

From: Fernando G  del Cueto
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 01:18:24
Message: <40909020$1@news.povray.org>
Wow! Why did it take so much time?

Did you use extremely-high values for the focal blur and radiosity?

It's nice btw,

Fernando


news:4090546d@news.povray.org...
> I used focal blur, area_light (2,2) and radiosity. CSG only.
>
> Total Time:  160 hours 37 minutes  41.0 seconds (578261 seconds)


Post a reply to this message

From: S  Cinar
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 01:55:18
Message: <409098c6@news.povray.org>
"Apache" <apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote

> Total Time:  160 hours 37 minutes  41.0 seconds (578261 seconds)

Did someone port POV to Z80?


Post a reply to this message

From: Felbrigg
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 04:40:07
Message: <4090bf67@news.povray.org>
> Did someone port POV to Z80?

Dont be rediculous, Z80, huh!  It's obviously ZX81.


Post a reply to this message

From: Apache
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 05:22:24
Message: <4090c950$1@news.povray.org>
I forgot to mention the original is 1600x1200 pixels :P


Post a reply to this message

From: Marc Jacquier
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 05:48:08
Message: <4090cf58$1@news.povray.org>

4090bf67@news.povray.org...
> > Did someone port POV to Z80?
>
> Dont be rediculous, Z80, huh!  It's obviously ZX81.
>
AFAIK the Sinclair ZX81 was based on a Z80 CPU  :)
With a mindboggling RAM amount up to 1kB :cp


Marc


Post a reply to this message

From: Ross
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 09:43:31
Message: <40910683$1@news.povray.org>
"Dave VanHorn" <dva### [at] cedarnet> wrote in message
news:40905727$1@news.povray.org...
> Standard UFO fueling port?
>
>
> "Apache" <apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:4090546d@news.povray.org...
> > I used focal blur, area_light (2,2) and radiosity. CSG only.
> >
> > Total Time:  160 hours 37 minutes  41.0 seconds (578261 seconds)
> >

with merry-go-round add on i think.


Post a reply to this message

From: gonzo
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 14:20:00
Message: <web.40914727c069d173a0c272b50@news.povray.org>
"Apache" <apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> I used focal blur, area_light (2,2) and radiosity. CSG only.

DON'T OPEN IT!!!

Leave it to the professionals!

Very nice looking nuclear waste repository though.

>
> Total Time:  160 hours 37 minutes  41.0 seconds (578261 seconds)

You're scaring me!  I'm wondering if my IRTC entry is going to finish
rendering in time...  Started it at 10:10 last night, before I left for
work this morning it was only about 25% done.

RG - looking for any tips on how to get decent focal blur without slowing to
a crawl


Post a reply to this message

From: Rafal 'Raf256' Maj
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 14:26:38
Message: <Xns94DACFBD411B7raf256com@203.29.75.35>
rgo### [at] lansetcom news:web.40914727c069d173a0c272b50@news.povray.org

> You're scaring me!  I'm wondering if my IRTC entry is going to finish
> rendering in time...  Started it at 10:10 last night, before I left for
> work this morning it was only about 25% done.

I have free 2 GHz + 2 GHz, send me .zip including .ini to adress:

pov 
in domain -
raf256.com

If You wish.

And decide and tell me full command line (including start/end row for each 
of two computers) or .ini files.




-- 
http://www.raf256.com/3d/
Rafal Maj 'Raf256', home page - http://www.raf256.com/me/
Computer Graphics


Post a reply to this message

From: Tor Olav Kristensen
Subject: Re: round thing
Date: 29 Apr 2004 21:22:19
Message: <4091aa4b$1@news.povray.org>
Marc Jacquier wrote:
...

> AFAIK the Sinclair ZX81 was based on a Z80 CPU  :)
> With a mindboggling RAM amount up to 1kB :cp

I have one under my bed !

-- 
Tor Olav
http://subcube.net
http://subcube.com


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.