|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:405a857a$1@news.povray.org...
> "Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iro umontreal ca> wrote in message
> news:405a8251$1@news.povray.org...
> > Ok. Monitoring CPU time, 99.7% went to povray,
> > 0.3% to everything else (including ssl/ssh, the shell,
> > and top).
> >
> > I remember trying something with lots of radiosity
> > samples, and that the 2GHz linux machine rendered
> > the picture in about 20-30% more time than the
> > 1.7GHz windows box povray. Both ahtlon machines,
> > lots of ram (1G)
> >
> > Maybe it depends on what exactly is rendered?
> > I'll run a few test in a week or so, when I come back
> > from the Antilles (yay! vacations!)
>
> Hmmm... if you'd like to do some stats with a test scene, I can fire up my
> box and get you some stats on what I get over here. It might be an
> interesting excercise. What flavor of Linux are you running?
>
> PS: thanks for the desktop image! It makes a FANTASTIC DESKTOP IMAGE!!!
>
Ditto! Thanks!!
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Steven Pigeon wrote:
> 1664h 27m 31.0 s
>
> Radiosity, photons, dispersion, focal blur, media.
> All the good things.
>
> (I have a desktop-sized render, if you want it,
> just ask)
i'm so sorry, can you send the desktop-sized one again, my spam-filter
ate it... i use popfile which is set to quarantine spam-messages, but it
often messes up quarantined attachments.
ciao,
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |