 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round "mystery"
and feedback would be appreciated!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mbCluedo.jpg' (134 KB)
Preview of image 'mbCluedo.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's a bit dark isn't it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Program ended abnormally on 5/7/03 8:09 AM, Due to a catastrophic Matt
Beighton error:
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round "mystery"
> and feedback would be appreciated!
>
I think it's a great idea, but unfortunately the image is way too dark for me to
be able to comment on the modeling.
Prof. Plum in the study with the candlestick?
--
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/* flabreque */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/* @ */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/* videotron.ca */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Matt Beighton" <mat### [at] hotmail com> wrote in
news:3eb8f7c0@news.povray.org
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC
> round "mystery" and feedback would be appreciated!
> begin 666 mbCluedo.jpg
to see *anything* I had to adjust gamma im graphics editor (with then
shown strong artefacts due to jpg comprssion)
--
#macro g(U,V)(.4*abs(sin(9*sqrt(pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))))*pow(1-
min(1,(sqrt(
pow(x-U,2)+pow(y-V,2))*.3)),2)+.9)#end#macro p(c)#if(c>1)#local
l=mod(c,100
);g(2*div(l,10)-8,2*mod(l,10)-8)*p(div(c,100))#else 1#end#end
light_source{
y 2}sphere{z*20
9pigment{function{p(26252423)*p(36455644)*p(66656463)}}}//M
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
1-1-1
Too dark. Fix the contrast. Too portray eerieness or nightime, use utlra
HIGH contrast and blue light.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp had a really good way of articulating the way to portray nighttime.
Suggestion: change your current light source to: rgb <0.2,0.2,2.0> and
repost it here.
"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj:-)565### [at] aolcom> wrote in message
news:3eb91dc7$1@news.povray.org...
> 1-1-1
>
> Too dark. Fix the contrast. Too portray eerieness or nightime, use utlra
> HIGH contrast and blue light.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt:
Clue! The concept is great. But, I agree with the others. Some
work on illumination is in order.
Aaron
"Matt Beighton" <mat### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3eb8f7c0@news.povray.org...
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round
"mystery"
> and feedback would be appreciated!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I cant see anything!
"Matt Beighton" <mat### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3eb8f7c0@news.povray.org...
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round
"mystery"
> and feedback would be appreciated!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great concept!
Others have commented on the lighting. I'd like to see a the lights that
cast the shadows of the playing pieces be quite yellowish, like the oil
lamps of yesteryear. I agree that the light casting the shadow of the
stick-up should be bluish.
Currently I find the background too distracting: is that a settee with
cushions? If so, then what is the photograph doing there? And what's with
the guy who looks like a 1950's politician? Maybe all this distraction will
resolve with better lighting...
You've taken on quite a task-- even in bright moonlight, most colors that
are percieved at night are really our imaginations filling in when there are
too few photons to work the cone cells. Possibly more contrast and less
saturation would be worth trying.
--
Will Woodhull
Thornhenge, SW Oregon, USA
willl.at.thornhenge.net
"Matt Beighton" <mat### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3eb8f7c0@news.povray.org...
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round
"mystery"
> and feedback would be appreciated!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Beighton, you should brighten.
(Waheeeeey! I'm a poet and I wasn't aware of the fact...)
Daft sod called Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My two bits on the illumination.
I'm guessing that that's a TV in the corner.
If so, that should add a nice bluish kind of night-time illumination.
Turn on your own TV at night with all the lights off and look around the room to see
what things look like. That's what I'm talking about.
Otherwise, I like the concept and the modelling. Well done so far.
Tom Bates
--
#macro T(B)#local m=mod(B,8);#local B=floor(B/8);m#end#local C=126981491245202;#
local D=115694168992822;sphere_sweep{b_spline 16#local i=0;#while(i<16)<T(C)-4,T
(D)-4,10-i/10>.1#local i=i+1;#end pigment{rgb 1}}light_source{-10,1} //Tom Bates
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Beighton wrote:
>Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round "mystery"
>and feedback would be appreciated!
>
We-eell... all I can see is a greenish blob on a black background that I
haven't a CLUE what it is...
Hard to get more mysterious than that!
A=2 T=? C=20
RG ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
remembers me my participation under topic horror
September-October of 1999....
I was the last one
a misunderstood, advanced work to its time
Bruno Gimeno
esto es la realidad
"Matt Beighton" <mat### [at] hotmailcom> escribió en el mensaje
news:3eb8f7c0@news.povray.org...
> Hey guys this is an image im working on for the current IRTC round
"mystery"
> and feedback would be appreciated!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
