finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
particles, media and a light source.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'fromwithin05_1600x1200.jpg' (175 KB)

Preview of image 'fromwithin05_1600x1200.jpg'

> finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
> particles, media and a light source.


Few images make my desktop background; this one did.

If it's not too late for suggestions, try off-centering it to remove
symmetry.

 - Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]

Post a reply to this message

oooh. ahhh. animate it pulsating! =)

Post a reply to this message

It's *never* too late for suggestions!

Post a reply to this message

Yes, I'm going to animate it too! But not in 1600x1200 resolution :P

Post a reply to this message

I have just started a 240 frames animation, 352x240.

Post a reply to this message

very nice image!
how long was the render time for this one?



"Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> schreef in bericht
news:3e94aca1@news.povray.org...
> finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
> particles, media and a light source.
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

No idea. I moved it several times to different machines, but let's say it
would take more than a week on a 1ghz box.

"Lenx" <len### [at] pandorabe> wrote in message news:3e954129@news.povray.org...
> very nice image!
> how long was the render time for this one?
>
>
>
> "Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> schreef in bericht
> news:3e94aca1@news.povray.org...
> > finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
> > particles, media and a light source.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

more then a week? wow.

"Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3e954537$1@news.povray.org...
> No idea. I moved it several times to different machines, but let's say it
> would take more than a week on a 1ghz box.
>
> "Lenx" <len### [at] pandorabe> wrote in message news:3e954129@news.povray.org...
> > very nice image!
> > how long was the render time for this one?
> >
> >
> >
> > "Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> schreef in bericht
> > news:3e94aca1@news.povray.org...
> > > finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
> > > particles, media and a light source.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

It's a spotlight pointed at the camera, or a point light?

Post a reply to this message

Point light.

Post a reply to this message

I always put those long rendes on a slightly lower priority and I forget
about them until they're done.

Post a reply to this message

Hi apache!

Simply amazing! What's the render time for this one?

florian

Post a reply to this message

Very long! I think it would take more than a week on a 1ghz computer. I
moved the render around from 400mhz, to 1gig and 2 gig machines until it was
finished.

Post a reply to this message

> Very long! I think it would take more than a week on a 1ghz computer. I
> moved the render around from 400mhz, to 1gig and 2 gig machines until it
was
> finished.

2GHz? That's disgusting... Our brand new fileserver is only a dual-PIII
1.1GHz... [other sulky comments deleted] Still, it does have 2GB of RAM...
<grin>

Andrew.

Post a reply to this message

Hey, nice.

If I did it - and I notice that I *DIDN'T* do it :-( - then I would have put
more colours into it. But the blue/brown tones you used seem to suit it very
well.

Thanks.
Andrew.

Post a reply to this message

"Apache" <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote in
news:3e94aca1@news.povray.org: 

> finally a bigger version with more particles done. There are 16354
> particles, media and a light source.
> 
> 

In space no one can hear you scream....


Beautiful image.  You always post such great images.

Post a reply to this message

Hey Apache!

> Very long!
I'm planning to do a isosurface-landscape and a media-sky for my WIP, but
after all i only got 600MHz over here ;-(
Perhaps i should go for a sky_sphere and a heighfield *g*. I still hope that
i will be able to talk my brother into doing the final render with his
athlon 2000+...

florian

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 19:19:26 +0200, Florian Brucker wrote:

> Hey Apache!
> 
>> Very long!
> I'm planning to do a isosurface-landscape and a media-sky for my WIP, but
> after all i only got 600MHz over here ;-(
> Perhaps i should go for a sky_sphere and a heighfield *g*. I still hope that
> i will be able to talk my brother into doing the final render with his
> athlon 2000+...
> 
> florian

Reminds me of one of my active projects... Just throw in media-based 
blueness, media fog, isosurface water with media inside, some isosurface 
balloons, and media radiosity to top it all off. Am I insane? I think so.

-- 
light_source#macro G(E)sphere{z+E*y*5e-3.04rotate-z*E*6pigment{rgbt#end{
20*y-10#local n=162;1}#while(n)#local n=n-.3;G(n)x}}G(-n).7}}#end//GregE

Post a reply to this message

Hey Greg!

> Reminds me of one of my active projects... Just throw in media-based
> blueness, media fog, isosurface water with media inside, some isosurface
> balloons, and media radiosity to top it all off. Am I insane? I think so.

You won't use photons? *g*

florian

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:00:19 +0200, Florian Brucker wrote:

> Hey Greg!
> 
>> Reminds me of one of my active projects... Just throw in media-based
>> blueness, media fog, isosurface water with media inside, some isosurface
>> balloons, and media radiosity to top it all off. Am I insane? I think so.
> 
> You won't use photons? *g*
> 
> florian

No reflective/refractive objects that'd make any significant difference in 
the results. Although I surely would if I had a reason... :-)

-- 
light_source#macro G(E)sphere{z+E*y*5e-3.04rotate-z*E*6pigment{rgbt#end{
20*y-10#local n=162;1}#while(n)#local n=n-.3;G(n)x}}G(-n).7}}#end//GregE

Post a reply to this message