1600 x 1200
focal blur w/100 samples, 0.999 confidence, 0.001 variance
scattering media
radiosity
photons
11 dispersive/refractive objects
4 large meshes

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

attachment?

:P

Post a reply to this message

perhaps he meant to imply that he was starting the render?  and that perhaps
in a few days, we'll see a result?

--
Slash
"Ross Litscher" <lit### [at] osuedu> wrote in message
news:3e665afa@news.povray.org...
> attachment?
>
> :P
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Weeks, rather than days. At least if he's talking about
submitting the entire image, not just fragments, judging
by the settings...

--
Tim Nikias v2.0
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde

> perhaps he meant to imply that he was starting the render?  and that
perhaps
> in a few days, we'll see a result?
>
> --
> Slash
> "Ross Litscher" <lit### [at] osuedu> wrote in message
> news:3e665afa@news.povray.org...
> > attachment?
> >
> > :P
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

On Wed, 05 Mar 2003 15:00:58 -0500, Timothy R. Cook wrote:

> 1600 x 1200
> focal blur w/100 samples, 0.999 confidence, 0.001 variance
> scattering media
> radiosity
> photons
> 11 dispersive/refractive objects
> 4 large meshes

Just to clarify, do you mean that you've started a render and you're 
mentioning the ridiculous settings to us? If so, what's the image? Your 
library?

PS, 11 dispersive objects? o.o Looks like you need my patch! :-)

Post a reply to this message

Greg Edwards wrote:
> Just to clarify, do you mean that you've started a render and you're 
> mentioning the ridiculous settings to us? If so, what's the image? Your 
> library?

Yeppers.

> PS, 11 dispersive objects? o.o Looks like you need my patch! :-)

Hehehe probably wouldn't hoit

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

Slashdolt wrote:
> perhaps he meant to imply that he was starting the render?  and that perhaps
> in a few days, we'll see a result?

Hmm time esimate at 50 PPM was over 26 days...here's hoping its
actual average is more than that :P

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

Time to upgrade that '486! :)

"Timothy R. Cook" <z993126bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:3e665776$1@news.povray.org...
> 1600 x 1200
> focal blur w/100 samples, 0.999 confidence, 0.001 variance
> scattering media
> radiosity
> photons
> 11 dispersive/refractive objects
> 4 large meshes
>
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
> N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
> PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
> D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>

Post a reply to this message

Out of curiousity, do IRTC entries have to be assembled and rendered
completely within the month of the given topic?

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

"Timothy R. Cook" wrote:
> 
> Out of curiousity, do IRTC entries have to be assembled and rendered
> completely within the month of the given topic?

Yes.

-- 
Ken Tyler

Post a reply to this message