 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As promised, the background.
Since the only external image map is the lettering (the spray-painted image
is produced by using camera normals and doing two passes on the render),
does this break IRTC rules?
John
--
Run Fast
Run Free
Run Linux
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'SmallWall.jpg' (102 KB)
Preview of image 'SmallWall.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Since the only external image map is the lettering (the spray-painted
image
> is produced by using camera normals and doing two passes on the render),
> does this break IRTC rules?
I don't think anyone's ever been concerned with prepublishing before. People
always post their IRTC WIPs.
The text "Good Morning America" makes me associate the image with the news
program on channel 5 that has the same name.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Slime" <slm### [at] slimeland com> wrote in message
news:3e43c748$1@news.povray.org...
>
> I don't think anyone's ever been concerned with prepublishing before.
People
> always post their IRTC WIPs.
Just making sure that the real sticklers for rules have no cause for
complaint.
> The text "Good Morning America" makes me associate the image with the news
> program on channel 5 that has the same name.
Comes from Steve Goodman's song "City of New Orleans" as sung by Arlo
Guthrie:
<sings>
Good morning, America, how are you?
Don't you know me? I'm your native son.
I'm the train they call the City of New Orleans
I'll be gone 500 miles when the day is done.
</sings>
John
--
Run Fast
Run Free
Run Linux
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I don't think anyone will mind you rendring the pic in two passes. I made an
entry that was rendered in two halves and put together in Corel paint and
nobody complained. Just be honest.
Mick
"Doctor John" <jgu### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:3e43c594@news.povray.org...
> As promised, the background.
>
> Since the only external image map is the lettering (the spray-painted
image
> is produced by using camera normals and doing two passes on the render),
> does this break IRTC rules?
>
> John
>
> --
> Run Fast
> Run Free
> Run Linux
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I used my 3D filter for the background in my image which
is very similar to yours :)
http://propro.ru/go/gallery/html/us2002.html
Gena.
Doctor John wrote:
> As promised, the background.
>
> Since the only external image map is the lettering (the spray-painted image
> is produced by using camera normals and doing two passes on the render),
> does this break IRTC rules?
>
> John
>
> --
> Run Fast
> Run Free
> Run Linux
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe times changed but long time ago for one of the IRTC entries
I prepared image which was also "glued" in Photoshop. I think that
was the reason for low rating that time :(
See the comments for gochild.jpg in:
http://www.irtc.org/stills/1997-12-31/view.html
Gena.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> I don't think anyone will mind you rendring the pic in two passes. I made an
> entry that was rendered in two halves and put together in Corel paint and
> nobody complained. Just be honest.
>
> Mick
>
> "Doctor John" <jgu### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
> news:3e43c594@news.povray.org...
> > As promised, the background.
> >
> > Since the only external image map is the lettering (the spray-painted
> image
> > is produced by using camera normals and doing two passes on the render),
> > does this break IRTC rules?
> >
> > John
> >
> > --
> > Run Fast
> > Run Free
> > Run Linux
> >
> >
> >
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
