 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi!
I just played around with isosurface for the first time and came up with
this. It's rather simple but I like it so I thought I should post it. It is
a isosurface plane displaced by a bozo with turbulence, lit only by
radiocity.
It took 9.5 hours on my P3 500 to render at 1600x1200 (scaled down version
attached). I will get some new hardware this weekend and I plan to make a
new version then. Any suggestions on how to improve it?
I just noticed a strange thing:
Pixels: 1930005
Where does the extra 10005 pixels come from?
--
Daniel Nilsson
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test06-640x480.jpg' (58 KB)
Preview of image 'test06-640x480.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Daniel Nilsson wrote:
> I just played around with isosurface for the first time and came up with
> this. It's rather simple but I like it so I thought I should post it. It is
> a isosurface plane displaced by a bozo with turbulence, lit only by
> radiocity.
Very nice picture indeed. It reminds me I need a new desktop wallpaper
too :)
> I just noticed a strange thing:
> Pixels: 1930005
> Where does the extra 10005 pixels come from?
Radiosity pretrace pixels ? Did you count how many there were ?
--
Jul### [at] cnedra org
http://www.cnedra.org
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You might enhance the depth a bit with some lighting effects.
Best,
D.
"Daniel Nilsson" <dan### [at] daniel-nilssoncom> wrote in message
news:3e2f14b6@news.povray.org...
> Hi!
>
> I just played around with isosurface for the first time and came up with
> this. It's rather simple but I like it so I thought I should post it. It
is
> a isosurface plane displaced by a bozo with turbulence, lit only by
> radiocity.
> It took 9.5 hours on my P3 500 to render at 1600x1200 (scaled down version
> attached). I will get some new hardware this weekend and I plan to make a
> new version then. Any suggestions on how to improve it?
>
> I just noticed a strange thing:
> Pixels: 1930005
> Where does the extra 10005 pixels come from?
>
> --
>
> Daniel Nilsson
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:34:09 -0500, Dennis Miller wrote:
> You might enhance the depth a bit with some lighting effects.
> Best,
> D.
>
I like it as it is. It has a deep, mysterious, almost underwater feel to
it. Adding any kind of direct lighting would ruin this effect.
BTW, this might look good on a desktop.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Remind me what is inside these psychedlic lamps : the purple_blobby liquid
continuously going up and down with the heat of the lamp... Nice lighting
indeed !
Tommy
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Julien Gourdon" <jul### [at] cnedraorg> wrote in message
news:3E2### [at] cnedraorg...
>
> Very nice picture indeed. It reminds me I need a new desktop wallpaper
> too :)
If anyone wants the full 1600x1200 png version (~1Mb) you can get it here:
http://bart.sm.luth.se/~dannil-9/test06.png
> > I just noticed a strange thing:
> > Pixels: 1930005
> > Where does the extra 10005 pixels come from?
>
> Radiosity pretrace pixels ? Did you count how many there were ?
>
That must be it, why didn't I think about that.
But at the end of the log the pretrace pixels are not counted:
Render averaged 64.05 PPS over 1920000 pixels
--
Daniel Nilsson
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
OK, this is just downright fantastic!
It's got pretty colours, it's got complex interesting shapes, it's got a
mysterious mood to it... what hasn't it got? Heck, I might even go download
the large version... (well, maybe). Simple, but very effective. I like it.
How to improve it? How about animating it? ;-)
Dam fine work!
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
