 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's the guy
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:50:16 -0800, Jim Charter wrote:
> That's the guy
Yours looks a little happier than the one in the photo! :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greg Edwards wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:50:16 -0800, Jim Charter wrote:
>
>
>>That's the guy
>
>
> Yours looks a little happier than the one in the photo! :-)
Guess I'm just a happy guy!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Highly impressive... The word "photorealistic" may be a bit over-used these
days, but this image is darn close to real!
Andrew.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3e2c2d68@news.povray.org...
> All procedural textures this time.
Great modelling here, and very photorealistic render.
Why don't you give it a go with MLPov ?
I think it would be cool.
Bye
Txemi Jendrix
http://www.txemijendrix.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
3e2c2d68@news.povray.org...
> All procedural textures this time.
Great work !
I really enjoy African art and it's a real treat (and a rarity) to see it
rendered in 3D !
G.
--
**********************
http://www.oyonale.com
**********************
- Graphic experiments
- POV-Ray and Poser computer images
- Posters
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
All I can say is, WOW.
Are those black and white specks necessary? They seem like
the effect of a popular trick used to make something look
more authentic, but your work is already so fantastically
realistic that they just sort of stick out. I would have
viewed the original but hamillgallery.com seems to be down.
Were these specks in the original?
Jim Charter wrote:
>All procedural textures this time.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mack Tuesday wrote:
> All I can say is, WOW.
>
> Are those black and white specks necessary? They seem like
> the effect of a popular trick used to make something look
> more authentic, but your work is already so fantastically
> realistic that they just sort of stick out. I would have
> viewed the original but hamillgallery.com seems to be down.
> Were these specks in the original?
The original shows some pitting, also some light flecks and blemishes
though not quite as stark as in my texturing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thankyou to everyone for your encouraging comments. It really makes my day!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
WOW :o)
Regards,
Hugo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
