 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There is an opening, the water is only half filling the neck of the bottle.
...though now you mention it that's not obvious in the picture is it?
Well, if I manage to reduce the amount of water coming out it should look okay.
Though I have no idea how I'm going to get the chaotic effect...
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Apache <apa### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:3e03e84b$1@news.povray.org...
> Good stuff! But water never runs out of a bottle this continuously. There
> has to be an "opening" somewhere (in the bottle or in the water stream) that
> allows air to fill the space in the bottle that is left by the water. In
> most cases this causes the water stream to be kind of chaotic and
> bubble-like.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> ...though now you mention it that's not obvious in the picture is it?
It doesn't have to obvious. In reality many things aren't obvious either!
> Though I have no idea how I'm going to get the chaotic effect...
That's a very difficult thing to do. Maybe Rune's (website) has something to
offer?
Regards,
Apache
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That's a very difficult thing to do. Maybe Rune's (website) has something to
> offer?
Hmm... Well I can't find anything suitable on his website, though it has given
me an idea. I think I can get a very realistic effect with blobs, provided I do
them right...
I'll post the results of my experimentation when I have them :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I'll post the results of my experimentation when I have them :)
Don't forget! :-)
I'm gonna get some sleep now. It's 0615 or something here (my computer
things it's 0644 however).
Regards!
Apache
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yeah likewise. It's 5:15 here! :)
I'll just pov one... more... thing...
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Apache <apa### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:3e03f76b@news.povray.org...
> > I'll post the results of my experimentation when I have them :)
> Don't forget! :-)
>
> I'm gonna get some sleep now. It's 0615 or something here (my computer
> things it's 0644 however).
>
> Regards!
> Apache
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The trees look like a sponge painting - using a coarse sponge to place
the paint. Very effective, and looks like a useful idea.
Can we have a few bubbles in the glass, pretty please? It doesn't look
right at the moment.
Overall, the eye _does_ seem to connect between the waterfall and the
glass.
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote
> All comments and thoughts will be a great help in finishing this image.
One of the reasons water doesn't look right is a stream in freefall gets
narrower as it drops (constant flux and increasing speed means diminishing
cross section). Also, there would be more turbulence around the stream.
Finally, I think a half filled glass would look better since you can show
off more dynamism with the surface (as it is, that much water falling from
that distance should be splashing outside the glass). Nice work overall.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> One of the reasons water doesn't look right is a stream in freefall gets
> narrower as it drops (constant flux and increasing speed means diminishing
> cross section).
Thank you! I hadn't thought of that at all. I agree with your other points too,
and I'm going to try to rework the water to look more realistic.
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
John Smith <me### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message news:3e0506a5$1@news.povray.org...
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote
>
> > All comments and thoughts will be a great help in finishing this image.
>
> One of the reasons water doesn't look right is a stream in freefall gets
> narrower as it drops (constant flux and increasing speed means diminishing
> cross section). Also, there would be more turbulence around the stream.
> Finally, I think a half filled glass would look better since you can show
> off more dynamism with the surface (as it is, that much water falling from
> that distance should be splashing outside the glass). Nice work overall.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The trees look like a sponge painting - using a coarse sponge to place
> the paint. Very effective, and looks like a useful idea.
Yeah, it has a certain something. I'm currently playing with the colours to help
them fit into the scene.
> Can we have a few bubbles in the glass, pretty please? It doesn't look
> right at the moment.
I plan on adding bubbles if I get time. Though the ones on the surface might be
difficult to do. It does look unnaturally clear without them.
> Overall, the eye _does_ seem to connect between the waterfall and the
> glass.
Cool, I'm glad of that :)
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Right, this is a test render of my attempt at improving the pouring water. I've
also tweaked various other bits and pieces, particularly the water materials.
I think it looks a lot better, but does it look realistic yet? Or should I put
more work into it?
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'final.jpg' (62 KB)
Preview of image 'final.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
